Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use --no-sync for pg_receivewal #642

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rdunklau
Copy link
Contributor

@rdunklau rdunklau commented Mar 28, 2025

Since we are only ever dumping it to a temp directory, use the --no-sync
argument.

About this change - What it does

Resolves: #xxxxx

Why this way

@rdunklau rdunklau force-pushed the rdunklau/use_no_sync_option branch from ea32e4e to cf91435 Compare March 28, 2025 07:28
@rdunklau rdunklau changed the title Use --no-sync for pg_receivewal Allow pg_receive_xlog_path to be a command Mar 28, 2025
@rdunklau rdunklau force-pushed the rdunklau/use_no_sync_option branch 3 times, most recently from 7eed3d1 to 18287e6 Compare March 28, 2025 08:52
@rdunklau rdunklau dismissed egor-voynov-aiven’s stale review March 28, 2025 09:43

It has been discussed during our meeting that the current way is fine.

@rdunklau rdunklau force-pushed the rdunklau/use_no_sync_option branch from 18287e6 to ea32e4e Compare March 28, 2025 11:09
Since we are only ever dumping it to a temp directory, use the --no-sync
argument.
@rdunklau rdunklau force-pushed the rdunklau/use_no_sync_option branch from ea32e4e to 9541026 Compare March 28, 2025 12:24
@rdunklau rdunklau changed the title Allow pg_receive_xlog_path to be a command Use --no-sync for pg_receivewal Mar 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@egor-voynov-aiven egor-voynov-aiven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@egor-voynov-aiven egor-voynov-aiven merged commit 4d98b74 into main Mar 28, 2025
6 checks passed
@egor-voynov-aiven egor-voynov-aiven deleted the rdunklau/use_no_sync_option branch March 28, 2025 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants