Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance secret configuration #400

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

b0661
Copy link
Collaborator

@b0661 b0661 commented Jan 21, 2025

Enhance configuration to support secret configuration values. Secret configuration values are held in a secrets file.

In the "normal" configuration the secret configuration can be referenced by the value "!secret <secret_key>".

The secret can only be accessed by config.secret("<key>") which follows the indirection if there is any, otherwise it returns the current value. If the secret value is accessed by config.<key> and there is a secret redirection then "!secret <secret_key>" will be returned, thus hiding the secret.

Closes #391

Should wait for #389 to cover nested configuration.

Enhance configuration to support secret configuration values.
Secret configuration values are held in a secrets file.

In the "normal" configuration the secret configuration can be referenced
by the value "!secret <secret_key>".

The secret can only be accessed by config.secret("<key>") which follows
the indirection if there is any, otherwise it returns the current value.
If the secret value is accessed by  config.<key> and there is a secret
redirection "!secret <secret_key>" will be returned, thus hiding the secret.

Signed-off-by: Bobby Noelte <[email protected]>
@b0661
Copy link
Collaborator Author

b0661 commented Feb 7, 2025

We switch to nested config.

@b0661 b0661 closed this Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ENH]: enhance privacy by limiting accuracy of lat and long values
1 participant