Skip to content

Glossary #361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025
Merged

Glossary #361

merged 23 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

evantahler
Copy link
Contributor

Arcade needs a glossary of terms.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 24, 2025 5:08pm

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a comprehensive glossary of terms to the Arcade platform documentation to help users understand key concepts and terminology.

  • Adds a new glossary page with detailed definitions organized into logical sections
  • Includes visual diagrams using Mermaid to illustrate relationships between concepts
  • Integrates the glossary into the documentation navigation structure

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
pages/home/glossary.mdx Creates comprehensive glossary with definitions for agents, tools, platform concepts, authentication, and billing terms
pages/home/_meta.tsx Adds glossary entry to the documentation navigation menu

@evantahler evantahler marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2025 22:47
@evantahler evantahler requested a review from shawneechase July 23, 2025 17:21

### Tool Executions

A 'tool execution' is a single call to a tool to interact with a remote system or service. The tool execution itself may fail (e.g. the user does not have permission to call the tool), but as long as the execution was able to be routed to a worker, the tool execution will be counted.
Copy link
Member

@EricGustin EricGustin Jul 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my opinion it seems unfair to charge a customer for a tool execution if one of our official tools fail because of a KeyError, for example. This would be our fault and not theirs. For now though we don't have the ability determine if the tool execution failure is ours or not 🙂

evantahler and others added 2 commits July 23, 2025 11:00
Co-authored-by: Nate Barbettini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nate Barbettini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nate Barbettini <[email protected]>
evantahler and others added 3 commits July 24, 2025 08:38
@evantahler evantahler requested a review from torresmateo July 24, 2025 15:39
@evantahler evantahler merged commit ebbe9ad into main Jul 25, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants