Update README.md

README.md

@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ Unity 6 introduces the awaitable type, [Awaitable](https://docs.unity3d.com/6000
 
 First, the functionality provided by Awaitable is equivalent to what coroutines offer. Instead of `yield return`, you use await; `await NextFrameAsync()` replaces `yield return null`; and there are equivalents for `WaitForSeconds` and `EndOfFrame`. However, that's the extent of it. Being coroutine-based in terms of functionality, it lacks Task-based features. In practical application development using async/await, operations like `WhenAll` are essential. Additionally, UniTask enables many frame-based operations (such as `DelayFrame`) and more flexible PlayerLoopTiming control, which are not available in Awaitable. Of course, there's no Tracker Window either.
 
-Therefore, I recommend using UniTask for application development. UniTask is a superset of Awaitable and includes many essential features. For library development, where you want to avoid external dependencies, using Awaitable as a return type for methods would be appropriate. UniTask can be converted to Awaitable using `ToAwaitable`, and Awaitable can be converted to UniTask using `ToUniTask`, so there's no issue in handling Awaitable-based functionality within the UniTask library. Of course, if you don't need to worry about dependencies, using UniTask would be the best choice even for library development.
+Therefore, I recommend using UniTask for application development. UniTask is a superset of Awaitable and includes many essential features. For library development, where you want to avoid external dependencies, using Awaitable as a return type for methods would be appropriate. Awaitable can be converted to UniTask using `AsUniTask`, so there's no issue in handling Awaitable-based functionality within the UniTask library. Of course, if you don't need to worry about dependencies, using UniTask would be the best choice even for library development.
 
 For Unit Testing
 ---