Skip to content

test labeler #20197

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test labeler #20197

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

steveny91
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@steveny91 steveny91 marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2025 15:39
@steveny91 steveny91 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2025 15:39
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.41%. Comparing base (b65c08d) to head (b0a49a7).
Report is 37 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
cassandra ?
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
presto ?
solr ?
traffic_server 96.15% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sarah-witt sarah-witt closed this May 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants