Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RUN_POSTPROCESSING variable to env_run.xml #537

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mnlevy1981
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

A new variable named RUN_POSTPROCESSING has been added to env_run.xml. This variable will be FALSE by default, but setting it to TRUE will (eventually) run some postprocessing scripts as part of the default workflow. In that respect, its behavior will be similar to how DOUT_S controls the short-term archiver.

This is part of the CESM push to add CUPiD to the CESM workflow. @rljacob asked that we keep the name generic (so this is not RUN_CUPID_ANALYSIS 😄), and the CUPiD team is definitely willing to change this to something else. It's not entirely clear that CMEPS is the best place to define this variable, as it stands it will show up in env_case.xml for all models using CMEPS but setting it to TRUE won't do anything in any of them except CESM.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @TeaganKing @billsacks @jedwards4b and @ekluzek all contributed during a recent hackathon

CMEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #): N/A

Are changes expected to change answers? bfb

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? None

Testing performed

Please describe the tests along with the target model and machine(s)
If possible, please also added hashes that were used in the testing

This variable will be FALSE by default, but setting it to TRUE will
(eventually) run some postprocessing scripts as part of the default workflow.
In that respect, its behavior will be similar to how DOUT_S controls the
short-term archiver.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants