Use 'unzipper' node module instead of system 'unzip' #2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was deploying on an environment where
unzipis not available as a system binary. Therefore, I replaced the call to the systemunzipwith the unzipper Node.js module. This way, the plugin can work in environments whereunzipis not available in the system.Beyond that, also made a few other changes:
yarn.lockgcloudwith@google-cloud/storage.gcloudhas been superseded bygoogle-cloudand then by@google-cloud/storage.fs-promiseThere are no tests in the repo but I can confirm that my changes work. I've been deploying application using this branch.