docs(conventions): separation of concerns for the internal doc #4295
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benelan
changed the title
|
This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please close your PR if it is no longer relevant. Thank you for your contributions. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
Stale
eriklharper
requested changes
Mar 31, 2022
conventions/Accessability.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
| # Accessability | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just noticed this filename is spelled incorrectly. Should be named Accessibility.md
eriklharper
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue: #3818
Summary
No content was changed or added. This PR is just the initial separation of concerns as we work towards expanding our internal doc to look more like Hub's storybook.
And here is ours with these changes:
The next step is beefing up our internal doc