-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Logit focal loss #2138
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
See also: [`Losses.focal_loss`](@ref) | ||
|
||
""" | ||
function logit_focal_loss(ŷ, y; γ=2.0f0, agg=mean, dims=1, ϵ=epseltype(ŷ)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some have crept in & need fixing, but there should not be greek-letter keywords. These can be gamma
and eps
?
Also, as written, γ=1.5
will cause Float32 input to be promoted to Float64. Can you avoid this somehow? Perhaps there should be a line like γ = gamma isa Integer ? gamma : convert(eltype(logpt), gamma)
. (Integer powers are faster.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh nice idea, can do!
0.665241 0.665241 0.665241 0.665241 0.665241 | ||
|
||
julia> Flux.logit_focal_loss(ŷ, y) ≈ 1.1277571935622628 | ||
true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This example output doesn't match what's written.
More importantly, the example is an opportunity to show exactly how this relates to focal_loss
, i.e. where the softmax
goes. And perhaps (if you can think of a compact & clear way) the relation to crossentropy
(or rather logitcrossentropy
?) too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah i still need to work through these tests, did not realize about the docstring tests until after already putting tests elsewhere :) Can do !
Co-authored-by: Michael Abbott <[email protected]>
It would be quite nice to have focal loss from logits, for numerical stability. This PR implements that! We have logit versions of crossentropy et al, so this i think has precedence!
PR Checklist