Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable naming global-ktable local store #277

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vmatic
Copy link

@vmatic vmatic commented Oct 26, 2020

The current implementation doesn't support naming the GlobalKTable store. This pull request adds functionality by extending the protocol IStreamsBuilder and adding a new arity to the existing global-ktable function. Implementation follows the same pattern used to name ktable local stores.

@vmatic vmatic requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2020 16:41
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #277 into master will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 90.90%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #277      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.16%   81.20%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        2586     2596      +10     
  Branches      153      153              
==========================================
+ Hits         2099     2108       +9     
- Misses        334      335       +1     
  Partials      153      153              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/jackdaw/streams/protocols.clj 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/jackdaw/streams.clj 82.53% <50.00%> (-0.67%) ⬇️
src/jackdaw/streams/interop.clj 82.71% <100.00%> (+2.16%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update daa8387...97cfef7. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants