Skip to content

Document the default CPT for GMT remote datasets #2573

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023
Merged

Document the default CPT for GMT remote datasets #2573

merged 13 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

seisman
Copy link
Member

@seisman seisman commented Jun 12, 2023

@seisman seisman added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Jun 12, 2023
@seisman seisman added this to the 0.10.0 milestone Jun 12, 2023
seisman and others added 2 commits June 12, 2023 20:50
Co-authored-by: Michael Grund <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yvonne Fröhlich <[email protected]>
@seisman seisman changed the title RFC: Document the default CPT for GMT remote datasets Document the default CPT for GMT remote datasets Jun 14, 2023
@seisman
Copy link
Member Author

seisman commented Jun 24, 2023

Ping @GenericMappingTools/pygmt-maintainers for review.

@seisman seisman requested a review from a team July 2, 2023 02:28
Copy link
Member

@yvonnefroehlich yvonnefroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fine!
Just one minor comment.

@seisman seisman added final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer and removed needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Jul 3, 2023
@seisman seisman merged commit 2413b61 into main Jul 4, 2023
@seisman seisman deleted the dataset-cpt branch July 4, 2023 08:25
@seisman seisman removed the final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer label Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants