Remove email verification on project verification form #1880
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Document the email verification architectural changeThe removal of email verification from project verification form represents a significant architectural change. To ensure smooth transition:
- Update the ProjectVerificationForm entity to reflect these changes
- Add database migrations to:
- Remove emailConfirmationToken field
- Update existing records
- Update API documentation to reflect that email verification is now handled at user profile level
- Add integration tests to verify the new flow
Would you like me to help generate the migration script or update the documentation?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts (2)
30-33: Verify the security implications of bypassing email verification
While this change aligns with moving email verification to the user profile, please ensure:
- The user profile's email verification status is properly validated before allowing project verification
- There's clear documentation about this architectural change
- Any dependent systems are updated to check email verification at the user level
Consider:
- Adding a check for user.emailConfirmed before creating the verification form
- Adding a migration to handle existing records
- Updating API documentation to reflect this architectural change
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
Email verification has been properly moved to user profile level
The codebase shows a clear architectural shift of email verification from project verification to user profile level, with proper implementation:
- Migration
1731071653657-addUserEmailVerificationColumns.tsadds dedicated user-level email verification columns - User entity has proper email verification fields and logic in
src/resolvers/userResolver.ts - Comprehensive email verification flow exists with verification codes and proper validation
- Project verification form's email fields are now just reference fields, with validation happening at user level
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for email verification checks in user profile and related components
rg -A 5 "emailConfirmed|emailVerification" --type ts
# Look for potential security checks around project verification
ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($PARAMS) {
$$$
verify$$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 25446
Line range hint 147-161: Consider removing obsolete email confirmation token functionality
Since email verification has been moved to the user profile, this function appears to be obsolete and should be removed to prevent confusion and maintain code cleanliness.
Done, thx @CarlosQ96 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts (1)
Line range hint
75-84: Add reviewer existence validationThe function uses
findUserByIdto fetch the reviewer but doesn't validate if the user exists or has admin privileges.Consider adding validation:
- form.reviewer = (await findUserById(params.adminId)) as User; + const reviewer = await findUserById(params.adminId); + if (!reviewer) { + throw new Error(i18n.__(translationErrorMessagesKeys.USER_NOT_FOUND)); + } + if (!reviewer.isAdmin) { + throw new Error(i18n.__(translationErrorMessagesKeys.USER_NOT_ADMIN)); + } + form.reviewer = reviewer;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts (1)
30-30: Fix typo in commentThe comment contains a typo: "becasue" should be "because"
- // This has been added becasue we are now doing verification of the email on user profile and not on project verification form + // This has been added because we are now doing verification of the email on user profile and not on project verification form
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/repositories/projectVerificationRepository.ts (2)
30-33: Review the email verification bypass implementation
The current implementation raises several concerns:
- Hardcoding
emailConfirmed=truebypasses actual verification - Setting
emailConfirmedAtwithout verification creates misleading audit trail - The implementation doesn't align with the PR objective of "removing" email verification - instead, it's marking all emails as verified
Line range hint 37-134: LGTM: Improved verification tracking
The changes to verification tracking are well-implemented:
- Addition of reviewerId tracking improves audit trail
- Setting verifiedAt timestamp provides better tracking
- Error handling is consistent across functions
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes