Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
… into production
  • Loading branch information
@tunetheweb
tunetheweb committed Nov 21, 2024
2 parents 6a9289e + 317a918 commit 118947a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 56 additions and 53 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/config/last_updated.json
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -753,8 +753,8 @@
},
"en/2024/chapters/accessibility.html": {
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"date_modified": "2024-11-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"hash": "0bfc638d1bdf26254e1c83e01857a7fe"
"date_modified": "2024-11-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"hash": "18dba531871c39af3383aee9cc0de50e"
},
"en/2024/chapters/cdn.html": {
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
Expand All @@ -778,8 +778,8 @@
},
"en/2024/chapters/ecommerce.html": {
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"date_modified": "2024-11-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"hash": "1197b631e967c9866d847221663d3054"
"date_modified": "2024-11-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"hash": "1d744116bde5acd029eba83f60cb5ce4"
},
"en/2024/chapters/fonts.html": {
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
Expand Down
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions src/content/en/2024/accessibility.md
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ There are two means by which we can identify country information, first by the G
{{ figure_markup(
image="country-by-geoid.png",
caption="Most accessible countries by GeoID.",
description="A bar cart with the GeoID, the country with the highest average for accessibility is the USA with a value of 84%. There is a drop of less a perscent as we move to Canada, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, France, Mexico, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Indonesia, India, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Turkey, Vietnam, China and finally the Republic of Korea with 78%. These were for countries that hosted more than 100000 domains.",
description="A bar chart with the GeoID, the country with the highest average for accessibility is the USA with a value of 84%. There is a drop of less a perscent as we move to Canada, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, France, Mexico, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Indonesia, India, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Turkey, Vietnam, China and finally the Republic of Korea with 78%. These were for countries that hosted more than 100000 domains.",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=421126157&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="260430925",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_country.sql",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ But it is a bit easier to see the TLD ranked and including the non-country codes
{{ figure_markup(
image="country-by-tld.png",
caption="Accessible countries by Top Level Domain (TLD).",
description="A bar cart with looking at Top Level Domains with more than 45,000 domains, we learn about accessibility. Displayed as a bar chart with the accessible domains .edu (Education), .gov (US Government), Norway, Filand, .io, Canada, USA, .app, UK, Sweden, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, .co, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, and South Africa, .org.",
description="A bar chart with looking at Top Level Domains with more than 45,000 domains, we learn about accessibility. Displayed as a bar chart with the accessible domains .edu (Education), .gov (US Government), Norway, Filand, .io, Canada, USA, .app, UK, Sweden, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, .co, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, and South Africa, .org.",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=783736776&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="1209052596",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_tld.sql"
Expand All @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ Not all government domains follow consistent accessibility rules, however we wer
{{ figure_markup(
image="accessible-governments.png",
caption="Most accessible government websites.",
description="A bar cart with with the most accessible global governments. The Netherlands (98%), Luxembourg (96%), Finland (94%), UK (92%), European Union (91%), Norway (91%), Jersey (91%), Singapore (92%), Belgium (91%), Germany (91%), France (90%), Australia (89%), New Zealand (89%), Dnmark (89%). ",
description="A bar chart with with the most accessible global governments. The Netherlands (98%), Luxembourg (96%), Finland (94%), UK (92%), European Union (91%), Norway (91%), Jersey (91%), Singapore (92%), Belgium (91%), Germany (91%), France (90%), Australia (89%), New Zealand (89%), Dnmark (89%). ",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=415917251&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="720509689",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_government.sql"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ We can also review the accessibility of various states.
{{ figure_markup(
image="US-state-governments.png",
caption="The most accessible US state governments.",
description="A bar cart with with the most accessible states in the US. Colorado (96%), Vermont (94%), Nevada (93%), South Carolina (91%), Georgia (91%), North Carolina (91%), Kansas (90%), Maine (90%), California (90%), New York (90%), Hawaii (89%), DC (89%), Rhode Island (89%), Missouri (89%), Massachusettes (89%), New Hampshire (89%), Minnesota (89%), Michigan (88%), Oregon (88%), Iowa (88%).",
description="A bar chart with with the most accessible states in the US. Colorado (96%), Vermont (94%), Nevada (93%), South Carolina (91%), Georgia (91%), North Carolina (91%), Kansas (90%), Maine (90%), California (90%), New York (90%), Hawaii (89%), DC (89%), Rhode Island (89%), Missouri (89%), Massachusettes (89%), New Hampshire (89%), Minnesota (89%), Michigan (88%), Oregon (88%), Iowa (88%).",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=174949843&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="720509689",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_government.sql",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ When most folks think about CMS, they think about the ones that you can download

{{ figure_markup(
image="traditional-cms.png",
caption="A bar cart with the accessible traditional Content Management Systems (CMS).",
caption="A bar chart with the accessible traditional Content Management Systems (CMS).",
description="The most accessible CMS with over 10,000 instances are AEM (87%), Contentful (87%), Sitecore (85%), WordPress (85%), Craft CMS (84%), Contao (84%), Drupal (84%), Liferay (83%), TypoCMS (83%), DNN (82%).",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=174688785&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="686463338",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1016,11 +1016,11 @@ The different CMS do have a lot of commonalities in the top errors that they hav

There are many tools which can be used to help authors evaluate the accessibility of a page. Institutions that control the browser configurations of their staff, could choose to simply install the open source <a hreflang="en" href="https://accessibilityinsights.io/docs/web/getstarted/assessment/">Accessibility Insights</a> browser plugin for all of their browsers. This would make errors much more visible to administrators. For many of the CMS above though, the best solution might be to install a tool like <a hreflang="en" href="https://sa11y.netlify.app/">Sa11y</a> or <a hreflang="en" href="https://editoria11y.princeton.edu/">Editoria11y</a> which is geared to help authors. From Joomla version 4.1 onwards <a hreflang="en" href="https://sa11y.netlify.app/joomla/">Sa11y is included by default</a>, so all authors benefit.

Website platforms in general performed better than the tTraditional CMS with Wix, Squarespace and Google Sites being significantly better.
Website platforms in general performed better than the Traditional CMS with Wix, Squarespace and Google Sites being significantly better.

{{ figure_markup(
image="platform-cms.png",
caption="A bar cart with the most accessible Website Platform Content Management Systems (CMS).",
caption="A bar chart with the most accessible Website Platform Content Management Systems (CMS).",
description="A bar graph with with the most accessible CMS: Wix (94%), Squarespace (92%), Google Sites (90%), Duda (87%), HubSpot CMS (87%), Pixnet (86%), Weebly (86%), GoDaddy Website Builder (85%), WebNode (84%), Tilda (83%).",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=1383581431&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="686463338",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ The differences show that it is possible for CMS to make an impact on accessibil
{{ figure_markup(
image="javascript-frontend-ui.png",
caption="Most Accessible JavaScript Frontend UI Frameworks.",
description="A bar cart with ranked with Stimulus (91%), Remix (89%), Owik (89%), Astro (89%), OpenUI5 (89%), Next.js (87%), React (87%), AlpineJS (86%), Htmx (85%), Svelte (85%), Ember.js (85%).",
description="A bar chart with ranked with Stimulus (91%), Remix (89%), Owik (89%), Astro (89%), OpenUI5 (89%), Next.js (87%), React (87%), AlpineJS (86%), Htmx (85%), Svelte (85%), Ember.js (85%).",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=1864888468&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="1029816121",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_frontend.sql"
Expand All @@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ Stimulus, Remix and Qwik are several percent more accessible on average than Rea
{{ figure_markup(
image="javascript-meta-frameworks.png",
caption="Most Accessible JavaScript Meta-frameworks.",
description="A bar cart with meta-frameworks are in the following order RedwoodJS (92%), Remix (89%), Astro (89%), SolidStart(88%), Gatsby (88%), Next.js (87%), Nuxt.js (84%), AdonisJS (82%), Quasar (82%), Meteor (73%).",
description="A bar chart with meta-frameworks are in the following order RedwoodJS (92%), Remix (89%), Astro (89%), SolidStart(88%), Gatsby (88%), Next.js (87%), Nuxt.js (84%), AdonisJS (82%), Quasar (82%), Meteor (73%).",
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=506578618&format=interactive",
sheets_gid="1029816121",
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_frontend.sql"
Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit 118947a

Please sign in to comment.