Skip to content

Issues: INSPIRE-MIF/gp-ogc-api-features

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

25 Open 37 Closed
25 Open 37 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Level for links for Requirements class “INSPIRE-pre-defined-data-set-download-OAPIF”
#91 opened May 1, 2023 by PB-GNM
1
DEPLOYMENT INSPIRE address points with Pygeoapi deployment Used to describe INSPIRed deployments of the OGC API - Features
#90 opened May 1, 2023 by PB-GNM
DEPLOYMENT INSPIRE address points with Geoserver deployment Used to describe INSPIRed deployments of the OGC API - Features
#89 opened May 1, 2023 by PB-GNM
DEPLOYMENT INSPIRE address points with Deegree deployment Used to describe INSPIRed deployments of the OGC API - Features
#88 opened May 1, 2023 by PB-GNM
Links for requirement classes don't work
#86 opened Dec 1, 2022 by PB-GNM
2
Unique Resource Identifier (M) should be removed from Annex C
#85 opened Jun 30, 2022 by heidivanparys
Participate in the November 2021 Geospatial API Virtual Code Sprint
#84 opened Nov 9, 2021 by ghobona
"A feature collection contains features of only one feature type" - really? In INSPIRE terms?
#83 opened Jul 16, 2021 by PeterParslow
2
Response parameters of the Direct Access Download operations need an update
#81 opened Feb 19, 2021 by heidivanparys
1
Part 3 of OGC API - Features out for public review (comments due by April 19, 2021)
#80 opened Feb 19, 2021 by heidivanparys
Good practice to refer to schema/documentation explaining the semantics
#72 opened Nov 12, 2020 by sgrellet
6
Good practice for on-demand extracted features MIG implication Issues to be raised for discussion by the MIG or MIG-T
#70 opened Oct 13, 2020 by tervo
2
Bulk download and HTML requirements class
#50 opened Aug 14, 2020 by heidivanparys
Bulk download and media types MIG implication Issues to be raised for discussion by the MIG or MIG-T
#47 opened Aug 13, 2020 by heidivanparys
1
Limitations of the strict feature collection requirements
#43 opened Jul 21, 2020 by cportele
10
Requirement /req/pre-defined/licence
#40 opened Jul 8, 2020 by heidivanparys
2
Add requirements regarding "self" and "alternate" links for each collection
#39 opened Jul 7, 2020 by heidivanparys
1
Implementing a View service in the same API MIG implication Issues to be raised for discussion by the MIG or MIG-T
#37 opened Apr 7, 2020 by cportele
1
Update the spec with requirements regarding CRSs
#34 opened Mar 14, 2020 by heidivanparys
1
Abbreviation "OAPIF" offers potential for confusion
#24 opened Jan 10, 2020 by jsaligoe
2
Section 7.2
#22 opened Jan 9, 2020 by AlexRamageScot1
31
Additional documentation: backgrounds, context and position of the new spec
#20 opened Jan 6, 2020 by thijsbrentjens
12
/rec/pre-defined/accept-language-header
#13 opened Dec 5, 2019 by cportele
3
Alternative proposals for how to implement the requirement for te download service to advertise the natural languages it supports? question Further information is requested
#5 opened Dec 5, 2019 by michellutz
3
/rec/multilinguality/content-language-paths question Further information is requested
#4 opened Dec 5, 2019 by michellutz
2
ProTip! Updated in the last three days: updated:>2024-12-01.