Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #99 #102

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Fix #99 #102

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mohamed82008
Copy link
Member

This PR fixes #99 and supersedes #100.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 60.00% and project coverage change: -0.58% ⚠️

Comparison is base (f9517dc) 84.25% compared to head (4ec5450) 83.68%.

❗ Current head 4ec5450 differs from pull request most recent head 7f53a38. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7f53a38 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #102      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.25%   83.68%   -0.58%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         470      478       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          396      400       +4     
- Misses         74       78       +4     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/AbstractDifferentiation.jl 79.01% <60.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gdalle gdalle mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2023
@gdalle gdalle marked this pull request as draft September 20, 2023 07:31
@gdalle
Copy link
Member

gdalle commented Sep 20, 2023

I think this will be superseded by #53 if we can manage it

@gdalle gdalle closed this Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pushforward_function and pullback_function are confused by tuples vs single input
2 participants