Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade lru-cache from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade lru-cache from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 4 years ago, on 2018-11-29.
Release notes
Package name: lru-cache from lru-cache GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: lru-cache
  • 57658f5 4.1.5
  • 33417aa since this is the legacy branch, don't bump the 'latest' dist-tag
  • b3b1042 revert to [email protected]
  • 099689d 4.1.4
  • e6937bb Don't test deprecated util.inspect() functionality
  • 15ca4ea Add snapshot regen script
  • 0f23036 Update package-lock.json
  • 91a1289 update travis
  • 9e022a6 Fix the requirement of 100% coverage...
  • 072ac11 Whitespace changes to make happy the new version of `standardize`
  • 66909f2 Upgrading packages to the latest version - It fixes `npm audit`:
  • 1c48788 Fixing and simplifying test-inspect.js using snapshot testing (see https://www.node-tap.org/snapshots/ )

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant