-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
using ManagedArray::reallocate() on a default-constructed ManagedArray doesn't actually allocate at all #90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -35,6 +35,25 @@ TEST(ManagedArray, SpaceConstructorCPU) | |
array.free(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
TEST(ManagedArray, ReallocDefaultConstructor) | ||
{ | ||
chai::ManagedArray<float> array; | ||
array.reallocate(1); | ||
float val = array[0]; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This causes a segfault in the current implementation, as the ManagedArray doesn't actually allocate anything during the reallocate call. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. changes look reasonable to me. |
||
(void)val; | ||
ASSERT_EQ(array.size(), 1u); | ||
} | ||
|
||
TEST(ManagedArray, ReallocSizeConstructor) | ||
{ | ||
chai::ManagedArray<float> array(10); | ||
array[0] = 1.0; | ||
array[9] = 2.0; | ||
array.reallocate(20); | ||
ASSERT_EQ(array[0], 1.0); | ||
ASSERT_EQ(array[9], 2.0); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#if defined(CHAI_ENABLE_CUDA) || defined(CHAI_ENABLE_HIP) | ||
TEST(ManagedArray, SpaceConstructorGPU) | ||
{ | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good, wait for David or Adam to approve as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will cause reallocate to allocate a pointer in every space - I'm not sure that's what we want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wrtobin @robinson96 - I think this PR introduces an unexpected change in behavior, can you take a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ooh - you're right David.
Bill, the model should preserve lazy allocation of device memory so that reallocations don't inadvertently initialize device memory if they haven't used gpu memory before. At one point, we had an implementation of reallocate that also strode to only do a deep copy of the data on any memory space where the data was active.