Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-order some of our content #43

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 5, 2017
Merged

Re-order some of our content #43

merged 4 commits into from
May 5, 2017

Conversation

bhennes2
Copy link
Contributor

Overall I think the content is very thorough.

I don't have a ton of feedback on the technical side as I haven't use the gem before, but everything passes a sniff test to me.

README.md Outdated

### Sorcery
[Sorcery][sorcery] is great and we highly recommend it. It is closer to what we wanted but still was a bit more than we needed and even the < 20 methods seemed like more than necessary.
Whenever your application manages users, you will inevitably need to handle email confirmation, password reset, user invitations, and other authentication flows. While not too complicated, they are sort of annoying to implement and some great libraries have our backs. [Devise][devise] and [Sorcery][sorcery] are great options that we have used in the past, but we found ourselves wanting both a little less and a little more. See our more detailed thoughts on these options [below](#comparisons-and-benchmarking).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My thought here is that we take a more firm stance by discussing Token Master first, as opposed to seemingly focusing on convincing people why it is different that an other options. I moved that to another section called Comparisons and Benchmarking. I'm not set on this idea, just offering a different perspective.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i like it! I would like to have more detail in the comparisons at some point too.

@bhennes2 bhennes2 requested a review from davemcorwin April 26, 2017 15:26
@inveterateliterate inveterateliterate merged commit fbdee5f into master May 5, 2017
@inveterateliterate inveterateliterate deleted the readme-updates branch May 5, 2017 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants