-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid symbol clashes with libc++ #2955
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
libc++ has moved towards just using unqualified `std::` for any partial qualification. That leads to a high chance of symbol clashes if we use the same names as them. As a first replace all uses of `__libcpp` with `_cccl` I was wondering about `__libcupp` but 🤷
miscco
force-pushed
the
avoid_libcpp_symbol_clashes
branch
4 times, most recently
from
November 25, 2024 18:36
2227597
to
96ae632
Compare
miscco
force-pushed
the
avoid_libcpp_symbol_clashes
branch
from
November 25, 2024 18:41
96ae632
to
ee29dfc
Compare
🟩 CI finished in 3h 26m: Pass: 100%/396 | Total: 2d 23h | Avg: 10m 48s | Max: 1h 25m | Hits: 84%/22058
|
Project | |
---|---|
CCCL Infrastructure | |
+/- | libcu++ |
CUB | |
Thrust | |
+/- | CUDA Experimental |
python | |
CCCL C Parallel Library | |
Catch2Helper |
Modifications in project or dependencies?
Project | |
---|---|
CCCL Infrastructure | |
+/- | libcu++ |
+/- | CUB |
+/- | Thrust |
+/- | CUDA Experimental |
+/- | python |
+/- | CCCL C Parallel Library |
+/- | Catch2Helper |
🏃 Runner counts (total jobs: 396)
# | Runner |
---|---|
327 | linux-amd64-cpu16 |
28 | linux-arm64-cpu16 |
26 | linux-amd64-gpu-v100-latest-1 |
15 | windows-amd64-cpu16 |
bernhardmgruber
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
davebayer
pushed a commit
to davebayer/cccl
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
* Drop `__libcpp` prefix in favor of `__cccl` libc++ has moved towards just using unqualified `std::` for any partial qualification. That leads to a high chance of symbol clashes if we use the same names as them. As a first replace all uses of `__libcpp` with `_cccl` I was wondering about `__libcupp` but 🤷 * Backport `is_constant_evaluated`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
libc++ has recently moved towards only qualifying their function calls with plain
std::
rather than a fully qualified::std::
That leads to potential symbol clashes with everything that is in namespace
cuda::std
As a first step we should drop any
__libcpp
prefix in favor of a cccl one.I was contemplating using
__libcupp
but settled on our prefered__cccl
While we are at it, drop one of the most frequent occurences by backporting
is_constant_evaluated