Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

haskellPackages.dependent-sum-template: fix #245359

Closed

Conversation

ncfavier
Copy link
Member

Fix dependent-sum-template and lambdabot with GHC 9.0, 9.2 and 9.4.

The test failure in the applied PR (obsidiansystems/dependent-sum-template#2 (comment)) only affects constructors with applied type variables as arguments, and is a build-time failure anyway.

Also remove no longer needed jailbreak on dependent-sum.

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Fixes the build with GHC 9.0, 9.2 and 9.4

Also remove no longer needed jailbreak on dependent-sum
@sternenseemann
Copy link
Member

Seems better than having lambdabot broken, what does @Ericson2314 say?

@ncfavier
Copy link
Member Author

Superseded by 8ecc5ec

@ncfavier ncfavier closed this Jul 29, 2023
@maralorn
Copy link
Member

I am sorry for not paying attention.

@ncfavier ncfavier deleted the dependent-sum-template branch July 29, 2023 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants