Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workflow for Auto Deployment from main branch #41

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Deus1704
Copy link
Collaborator

@Deus1704 Deus1704 commented Oct 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced an automated workflow for deploying the MkDocs site to GitHub Pages, streamlining updates with each push or pull request to the main branch.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file named deploy_gh-pages.yml within the .github/workflows/ directory. The workflow automates the deployment of a MkDocs site to the gh-pages branch, triggered by pushes and pull requests to the main branch. It includes steps for checking out the repository, setting up a Python environment, installing dependencies, building the MkDocs site, pushing changes to a new branch, and creating a pull request to merge these changes into the gh-pages branch.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml New workflow for automating MkDocs site deployment to gh-pages branch.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where code does bloom,
A workflow now clears the room.
With MkDocs ready, the site will shine,
As branches merge and all align.
Hops of joy in every commit,
A rabbit's dance, we won't quit! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml (4)

11-13: Consider improving job name and runner specification.

While the current setup works, consider the following improvements:

  1. Use a more descriptive job name, such as "deploy-mkdocs" or "build-and-deploy".
  2. Specify a precise Ubuntu version (e.g., ubuntu-22.04) instead of latest to ensure consistent behavior across runs.

Example:

jobs:
  deploy-mkdocs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-22.04

41-51: LGTM: Pull request creation step is well-configured.

The PR creation step is well-implemented using the peter-evans/create-pull-request@v5 action. The configuration is appropriate for updating the gh-pages branch.

Minor suggestion: Consider adding labels to the PR for easier identification:

labels: |
  automated pr
  documentation

This will help in quickly identifying automated documentation update PRs.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 48-48: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


48-48: Remove trailing spaces.

There are trailing spaces at the end of line 48. Please remove them to improve code cleanliness and adhere to YAML best practices.

Before:

          It's an automated workflow, which can be found in `.github/workflows` 

After:

          It's an automated workflow, which can be found in `.github/workflows`
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 48-48: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


1-51: Overall, the workflow is well-structured for deploying a MkDocs site.

The workflow effectively automates the process of building and deploying a MkDocs site to GitHub Pages. The suggested improvements will enhance its robustness, consistency, and efficiency.

Key points:

  1. Improved job naming and runner specification
  2. Enhanced environment setup with precise versioning and dependency management
  3. More robust git operations
  4. Minor refinements in the PR creation step
  5. Addressed a minor YAML formatting issue

These changes will result in a more maintainable and reliable workflow.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of the suggested improvements?

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 16-16: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 48-48: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b349bf and 266c59f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml

[warning] 16-16: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 48-48: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml (1)

1-9: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger events are well-defined.

The workflow name accurately describes its purpose, and the trigger events are appropriately set for deploying changes from the main branch.

.github/workflows/deploy_gh-pages.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +31 to +39
- name: Push changes to new branch
run: |
git config --global user.name 'github-actions[bot]'
git config --global user.email 'github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com'
git checkout -b gh-pages-update
cp -r site/* .
git add .
git commit -m "Update GitHub Pages from action [skip ci]"
git push origin gh-pages-update --force
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve the push changes step.

The current implementation is generally good, but consider the following improvements:

  1. Use git config --local instead of --global to avoid affecting the entire system:
    git config --local user.name 'github-actions[bot]'
    git config --local user.email 'github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com'
  2. Add error handling to check if the branch already exists:
    git checkout -b gh-pages-update || git checkout gh-pages-update
    git pull origin gh-pages-update || true
  3. Consider using git add -A instead of git add . to ensure all changes (including deletions) are staged.

These changes will make the step more robust and less likely to cause conflicts.

@Deus1704 Deus1704 closed this Oct 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant