Update infrastructure

[timmens]

What problem do you want to solve?

Match the code base infrastructure with that of estimagic.

Changes

• Replace testing with tox with pure pytest testing
• Update main workflow file
• Add publish to pypi workflow
• Update issue and pull request templates
• Update .gitignore
• Update pre-commit and linting files
• Update LICENSE
• Replace RST files with Markdown files (except for documentation files)
• Delete outdated documentation
• Use ruff blacklisting (depart from estimagic here)

Todo

• Target the right branch and pick an appropriate title.
• Put Closes #XXXX in the first PR comment to auto-close the relevant issue once
  the PR is accepted. This is not applicable if there is no corresponding issue.
• Update CHANGES.md

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4 (c66fdc6) into main (f5d91c6) will decrease coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 93.25%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #4      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.46%   98.29%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        1110     1058      -52     
==========================================
- Hits         1093     1040      -53     
- Misses         17       18       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/lcm/create_params.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/lcm/distributions.py	77.77% <0.00%> (ø)
src/lcm/entry_point.py	97.05% <0.00%> (ø)
tests/test_interpolation.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/lcm/example_models.py	84.00% <50.00%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
src/lcm/discrete_emax.py	97.87% <80.00%> (-0.21%)	⬇️
src/lcm/process_model.py	97.84% <87.50%> (-1.11%)	⬇️
src/lcm/dispatchers.py	96.77% <100.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
src/lcm/function_evaluator.py	96.05% <100.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
src/lcm/grids.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 13 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[ChristianZimpelmann]

I had a look over it and made a few small comments.

Also:

• Don't you think the documentation could still be of use? It seems to be quite general.. but haven't had a closer look at it.

• I cannot say much about some parts of the setup (e.g. tox vs pytest, ruff blacklisting)

[timmens]

Thank you @ChristianZimpelmann

• Don't you think the documentation could still be of use? It seems to be quite general.. but haven't had a closer look at it.

Janos recommended deleting it. The docs were comprised mostly of design notes, which are rather developer documentation. I think this developer documentation is very important, but I want to use a different format ---something not on GitHub. Some of Janos' notes would be integrated into this new format.

• I cannot say much about some parts of the setup (e.g. tox vs pytest, ruff blacklisting)

Maybe @hmgaudecker can comment on this.

[hmgaudecker]

Happy to do so, but unlikely to happen before our meeting.

[ChristianZimpelmann]

The docs were comprised mostly of design notes, which are rather developer documentation. I think this developer documentation is very important, but I want to use a different format ---something not on GitHub. Some of Janos' notes would be integrated into this new format.

That makes sense! Just wanted to make sure that the design notes are not lost.

[hmgaudecker]

Excellent, thanks! I do have many comments, but almost all of them should be very quick and none of them requires any discussion; if you want to leave some of the ruff things as they are, just make a quick note, please.

[timmens]

Leaving docformatter at v1.5.1 instead of v.1.6.0 because of incompatibilities with black.

[hmgaudecker]

Leaving docformatter at v1.5.1 instead of v.1.6.0 because of incompatibilities with black.

Let's just delete it, ruff should take care of it eventually.

[hmgaudecker]

Just for Github to remember I browsed through changes up to this point.

[hmgaudecker]

(I actually did not mean to approve, else the message would not have made sense, but I might as well have. So just merge as you see fit)

Thanks!