-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
[EDOI] Add new object types EDOI #681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Hi @i506210, Thank you for your contribution. Would you mind to split this pull request (PR) into two PRs? One for EDOI and one for EDOT. I believe the handling for one PR per object type will be easier. Furthermore, you might want to remove the Thanks :) |
Hi @schneidermic0, I have split Pull request into 2 and triggered PR. could you please check Thanks & REgards, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Venkat,
thanks for the update. I've added some questions/comments to your pull request.
Please note, that for the title and description, we use title case and sentence case respectively. I've not marked every occurrence but if you could please adjust that.
"! <p class="shorttext">Interface Version</p> "<- title (title case)
"! Interface version "<- description (sentence case)
Hi
Hi Michael, I corrected all the places. Thanks & Regards, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@GuilhermeSaraiva96 requested my review.
Please see my feedback and questions below.
file-formats/edoi/README.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The example is missing. The example (and its example data) would be really helpful for our reviews. In the end it is needed anyhow.
If this won't be feasible we should create at least an issue in this repository for adding the example later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right now I haven't worked on preparing example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, before we merge, we should create at least an issue for this in this repository. Pleas keep this comment as unresolved...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reacted to your comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, @i506210 for all your adaptations.
Except the missing example this looks good to me, now. I add also the label for UX review, now.
No description provided.