task/WP-834 - Add behavior for ignoring DesignSafe-Corral allocation for running jobs

[fnets]

Overview

Added changes to remove TAS projects that are purely administrative from default allocations, as they were preventing a few users from running jobs.

Related

• WP-834

Changes

• A setting that allows us to configure which projects should be removed, which defaults to DesignSafe-DCV and DesignSafe-Corral

Testing

Difficult to test, because either of those projects will need to be your default allocation to see the change, BUT

1. Run a job that needs DCV and a job like compress/extract that doesn't allow you to pick the allocation that you run against.
2. Make sure the job submits successfully.

UI

Notes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.37%. Comparing base (96eb02e) to head (cfd9039).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
server/portal/apps/users/views.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
server/portal/settings/settings.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1057      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.38%   70.37%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         538      538              
  Lines       33313    33316       +3     
  Branches     2955     2956       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        23446    23446              
- Misses       9669     9672       +3     
  Partials      198      198              

Flag	Coverage Δ
javascript	72.54% <ø> (ø)
unittests	61.10% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
server/portal/settings/settings.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
server/portal/apps/users/views.py	57.48% <0.00%> (-0.70%)	⬇️

[chandra-tacc]

LGTM, just one minor comment

[chandra-tacc]

LGTM, just one minor comment
I did a live comment of the minor comment. So, all good

[edmondsgarrett]

LGTM, thanks for this addition!