NP-862 replicator support cura cloud #352
Conversation
Curator has the following assumptions when creating the matcher for a material. If in the machine block of an fdm_material there is **ANY** hotend defined then the other hotends for that material are incompatible. See UltiMaker PLA forn the S-lines they don't define CC and DD cores therefore and Cura marks them as incompatible. If there are **NO** hotend defined in any hotend for that machine is compatible. And a dev can set the the hardware compatibility explicit to yes/no This seemed to work for everything, but apparently Cura still does some other Voodoo Magic. Adding support in the resources itself is easier than changing the business logic in Curator for this: - https://github.com/Ultimaker/Curator/blob/c3c0c5a62b4579dd1d69c63d24124a1fa944df5c/include/curator/settings/data/material.h#L250 - https://github.com/Ultimaker/Curator/blob/c3c0c5a62b4579dd1d69c63d24124a1fa944df5c/include/curator/configuration/matching_rules.h#L190 Which has a change to introduce regressions in our existing printer support. This should not change the behaviour of Cura Contribute to NP-862
|
@alanbjorklund and/or @pkuiper-ultimaker I wanted to confirm; should PLA be compatible with Smart Extruder+ Experimental at all in Cura? |
In CloudPrint I cannot find the "Smart Extruder+ Experimental". It only appears to be available in the Cura profiles.
However, the Cura profiles show that PLA and Tough PLA are compatible with the following three extruders:
So I'm a bit confused. @alanbjorklund what are the valid configurations? |
|
The intended Smart Extruder configurations are: 1- PLA (Smart Extruder+) The third option is available in CloudPrint, but only when a printer is connected with this extruder attached. We decided to remove this restriction when slicing in Cura because it seems needlessly complicated. I just checked 5.10 stable and the three configurations listed above seem to be behaving as expected. (blocking PLA with the Smart Extruder+ Tough).
|
|
@wawanbreton it seems to behave in Cura, please merge these current changes therefore. @alanbjorklund and @pkuiper-ultimaker can you guys update the material generator to always explicitly mention the hot-end you want to support, if there is atleast one one hot-end defined for a machine. For the reasons see above |
Curator has the following assumptions when creating the matcher for a material.
If in the machine block of an fdm_material there is ANY hotend defined then the other hotends for that material are incompatible. See UltiMaker PLA forn the S-lines they don't define CC and DD cores therefore and Cura marks them as incompatible.
If there are NO hotend defined in any hotend for that machine is compatible.
And a dev can set the the hardware compatibility explicit to yes/no
This seemed to work for everything, but apparently Cura still does some other Voodoo Magic.
Adding support in the resources itself is easier than changing the business logic in Curator for this:
Which has a change to introduce regressions in our existing printer support. This should not change the behaviour of Cura
Contribute to NP-862
FYI @Frederic98, @pkuiper-ultimaker and @alanbjorklund