Merge pull request #275 from Anselmoo/ideas4templates

Fixed Issue #274, Three templates for:  - PR - Issue - Feature Request

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+## 🐛🐛 Bug Report
+
+
+### ⚗️ Current Behavior
+A clear and concise description of the behavior.
+
+**Input Code**
+- REPL or Repo link if applicable:
+
+```python
+def function_wrong():
+    pass
+```
+
+**Expected behavior/code**
+A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen (or code).
+
+```python
+def function_right():
+    # Here is the fix
+    print("Ok)
+
+```
+
+### ⚙️ Environment
+
+- `Python` version(s):
+    - *good*: [e.g. 3.8]
+    - **better**: [3.8.6 - Clang 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.27)]
+- `OS`: [e.g. Ubuntu 18.04, OSX 10.13.4, Windows 10]
+- `IDE`: [Vim, VS-Code, Pycharme]
+- `Packages`: [ `Tensorflow==2.1.2 - latest`]
+
+
+### 🧰 Possible Solution  (optional)
+<!--- Only if you have suggestions on a fix for the bug -->
+
+### 🖼 Additional context/Screenshots (optional)
+Add any other context about the problem here. If applicable, add screenshots to help explain.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## 🚨🚨 Feature Request
+
+- [ ] Related to an existing [Issue](../../../issues) 
+- [ ] A new implementation (Improvement, Extension) 
+
+### Is your feature request related to a problem?
+
+A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I have an issue when [...]
+
+### If your feature will improve `HUB`
+
+A clear and concise description of how it will help `HUB`. Please prefer references, if possible [...]
+
+
+### Description of the possible solution
+
+A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. Add any considered drawbacks.
+
+### An alternative solution to the problem can look like
+
+A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
+
+**Teachability, Documentation, Adoption, Migration Strategy**
+If you can, explain how users will be able to use this and possibly write out a version the docs.
+Maybe a screenshot or design?

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+## 🚀 🚀 Pull Request
+
+### All Submissions:
+
+- [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
+- [ ] Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open [Pull Requests](../../../pulls) for the same update/change?
+- [ ] Is your [Pull Requests](../../../pulls) linked to an [Issue](../../../issues)
+
+
+
+### New Feature Submissions:
+
+- [ ] Does your submission pass all `tests`?
+- [ ] Does your submission not lower the `coverage-rate`?
+- [ ] Have you lint your code locally prior to submission; including `black` style?
+- [ ] Have you describe your new feature in the `docs`?
+
+
+### Changes to Core Features:
+
+- [ ] Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
+- [ ] Have you written new `tests` for your core changes, as applicable?
+- [ ] Have you successfully ran `tests` with your changes locally?
+- [ ] Have you keep the `coverage-rate` constant?
+- [ ] Have you keep the `coverage-rate` up?
+- [ ] Are the `docs` up to date?