For C++17, use range-v3 instead of std::ranges

[joka921]

This is a first step towards making QLever compile with C++17.

If the compile-time flag QLEVER_CPP_17 is set, use Eric Niebler's range-v3 library as a drop-in replacement for std::ranges. In the code, we simply write ql::ranges instead of std::ranges in most places. Some places need special treatment. For example, where std::ranges was used as a C++20 concept, we now use the macros CPP_template and CPP_and (also from the range-v3 library), which does the right thing for both C++20 and C++17.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.88138% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.69%. Comparing base (70964d6) to head (e712d6b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/util/StringUtilsImpl.h	90.00%	0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/engine/idTable/IdTable.h	87.50%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/engine/sparqlExpressions/SparqlExpression.cpp	25.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/util/JoinAlgorithms/JoinAlgorithms.h	90.00%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
src/engine/QueryPlanner.cpp	95.34%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/engine/idTable/CompressedExternalIdTable.h	85.71%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/util/ChunkedForLoop.h	80.00%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/engine/CartesianProductJoin.cpp	95.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/engine/MultiColumnJoin.cpp	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...engine/sparqlExpressions/RelationalExpressions.cpp	85.71%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 3 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1667      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.70%   89.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         383      385       +2     
  Lines       36962    36955       -7     
  Branches     4178     4179       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        33155    33147       -8     
- Misses       2508     2509       +1     
  Partials     1299     1299              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hannahbast]

1-1 with Johannes, this is awesome, some minor changes left as discussed

[sparql-conformance]

Conformance check passed ✅

No test result changes.

Details: https://qlever.cs.uni-freiburg.de/sparql-conformance-ui?cur=e712d6baa99f49adeb2d6a56232f37a94f83dda8&prev=70964d6e5aaaf0d5f507c384c78933327865342a

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
24 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud