-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New release? #536
Comments
Also interested to know about this plan. We are having to fork and use our own |
I don't have time to revive the project right now, but I can review and merge PRs if someone wants to get started. First task will be to get the CI running again, replacing Travis with Github. Use the configuration from one of our other repos as a reference, e.g.: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp-jinja2/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci.yml |
@Dreamsorcerer Should the Github CI build upon the tox/Makefile setup, or doesn't matter how it does the job as long as it lints tests and deploys? |
Doesn't need tox, just use a version matrix like in the other projects. |
OK, CI is running again (thanks @Mark90). A few more tasks I'd like to take a look at before making a new release (updating aioredis is the main one, and should definetely happen before release):
If anyone wants to pick up some of these tasks, that would be great. |
@Dreamsorcerer, could you check 572? It's for the last checkbox :) |
so is this project dead? |
Tests are running again, except for #585. If anyone has time to debug that one, that would be great. I'll continue on with the other tasks on the list for now, and start looking at all the open PRs. |
OK, I think as we sort out typing, aiojobs and other open issues, it looks like there will need to be some significant changes to the design. So, I'll push a release as soon as we have Python 3.11 sorted. The tests on 3.11 are failing, seemingly with the caches not retrieving values: #618. |
Right, looks like we've got 3.11 working (thanks @a68366). I'll look at doing a release on Friday. If there's any more PRs people want merged, now is the time. There are quite a few reasonable looking PRs that people haven't bothered to add tests to. So, if anyone wants to finish up any of those, that'd be great. |
OK, finally out. If anyone wants to contribute to the next major release, I've tagged several things to do under the 1.0 milestone which are likely to result in backwards-incompatible changes. |
@Dreamsorcerer Thank you for driving all these updates and getting them released. |
There are a few useful changes that are not available in the latest 0.11.1 release, such as #478 (fixing Redis
clear
with namespace that happens to be empty), #470 (quieter imports), #514 (explicit support for Python 3.9).I couldn't find documentation of release plans, so I figured I would just ask here :)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: