Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect determination of interacting pairs #3

Open
a-r-j opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Incorrect determination of interacting pairs #3

a-r-j opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@a-r-j
Copy link

a-r-j commented May 1, 2024

Hi @anton-bushuiev, nice work and congrats on the ICLR acceptance.

I noticed there are some instances of incorrect interfaces in the raw set e.g. 7lgq_D_H.pdb which only contains a single atom for chain H. Is this intended?

@anton-bushuiev
Copy link
Owner

Hi @a-r-j, thank you for writing!

It is intended that 7lgq_D_H.pdb has only one atom for chain H because in the original PDB file there is only one ATOM record for chain H and the raw set contains all the interactions where at least one contact between different chains is present.

Nevertheless, what is not expected is that the buried surface area in the 7lgq_D_H.pdb file is more than 500A^2 which is a criterion for filtering out "small" interactions like this. I will investigate this further after ICLR. Thank you for catching this!

Are there any other instances that you find incorrect? I can take a closer look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants