Skip to content

Change groupId in README #2049

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2025
Merged

Change groupId in README #2049

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2025

Conversation

isopov
Copy link
Contributor

@isopov isopov commented Jul 28, 2025

GroupId of the project was changed in f116223 but references in README were left.

GroupId of the project was changed in f116223 but references in README were left.
@bschoening bschoening requested a review from Copilot August 12, 2025 12:48
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates Maven groupId references in the README documentation to reflect a previous change from com.datastax.oss to org.apache.cassandra. The changes ensure the documentation accurately reflects the current project structure.

  • Updates groupId references in documentation text
  • Updates Maven search URL to use the new groupId

@bschoening
Copy link
Contributor

@isopov looks like this may be a duplicate of #1941

@absurdfarce would be nice to merge this to prevent any confusion

@absurdfarce
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed @bschoening. I'll merge this one and close out the other one with a reference to this PR.

@absurdfarce absurdfarce self-requested a review August 12, 2025 18:31
@absurdfarce absurdfarce merged commit 8c9509c into apache:4.x Aug 12, 2025
1 check failed
@absurdfarce absurdfarce mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2025
absurdfarce pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
patch by Ivan Sopov; reviewed by Bret McGuire
reference: #2049
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants