Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FINERACT-2181: Rework "createMissingAccrualTransactionDuringChargeOffIfNeeded" to avoid flushing and triggering business event as part of Transaction processor #4446

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mariiaKraievska
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Rework "createMissingAccrualTransactionDuringChargeOffIfNeeded" to avoid flushing and triggering business event as part of Transaction processor.

Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests

  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.

  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.

  • Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.

  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes

  • Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)

FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.

…IfNeeded" to avoid flushing and triggering business event as part of Transaction processor
transactionChanges.add(new TransactionChangeData(oldTransaction, newTransaction));
}

public void addTransactionChange(final TransactionChangeData transactionChangeData) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addReversedTransaction and addTransactionChange is pretty much the same... should we rather use just 1 method and as parameter we can provide the old and new? (including if any of them is null?)

final ChangedTransactionDetail changedTransactionDetail = loan.getTransactionProcessor().processLatestTransaction(loanTransaction,
new TransactionCtx(loan.getCurrency(), loan.getRepaymentScheduleInstallments(), loan.getActiveCharges(),
new MoneyHolder(loan.getTotalOverpaidAsMoney()), new ChangedTransactionDetail()));
if (!loan.isInterestRecalculationEnabled()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why to filter for disabled interest recalculation?

for (final Map.Entry<Long, LoanTransaction> mapEntry : changedTransactionDetail.getNewTransactionMappings().entrySet()) {
loanAccountService.saveLoanTransactionWithDataIntegrityViolationChecks(mapEntry.getValue());
loanAccountTransfersService.updateLoanTransaction(mapEntry.getKey(), mapEntry.getValue());
final List<TransactionChangeData> sortedChanges = changedTransactionDetail.getTransactionChanges().stream()
Copy link
Contributor

@adamsaghy adamsaghy Mar 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why to sort them again? the list should contain in the right order the created / reversed / reverse-replayed transactions.

@@ -1375,6 +1385,9 @@ private void handleChargeOff(final LoanTransaction loanTransaction, final Transa
if (transactionCtx instanceof ProgressiveTransactionCtx progressiveTransactionCtx) {
progressiveTransactionCtx.setChargedOff(true);
}
if (!loanTransaction.getLoan().isInterestRecalculationEnabled()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we filter here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants