-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IGNITE-22733 Introduce TransactionChanges #11675
Conversation
...c/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/transactions/TransactionChanges.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* Sort new and updated entries collection. | ||
* @param comparator Entries comparator | ||
*/ | ||
public void sortNewAndUpdatedEntries(Comparator<E> comparator) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to specify comparator in constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
for (TransactionConcurrency txConcurrency : TransactionConcurrency.values()) { | ||
ExecutorType[] nodeExecTypes = {ExecutorType.SERVER, ExecutorType.CLIENT}; | ||
ExecutorType[] thinExecTypes; | ||
|
||
if (modify == SQL) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need this changes in this patch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main reason to include test changes in patch is to reduce main patch.
Exclude obvious changes from it.
So I thins yes, we need this :)
); | ||
|
||
txChanges.get2().sort(this::compare); | ||
} | ||
else | ||
txChanges = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can replace with TransactionChanges#EMPTY, it will done automatically in call ectx.transactionChanges
. It will help to remove useless check for null in 254L.
…test
Thank you for submitting the pull request to the Apache Ignite.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution
we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken:
The Contribution Checklist
The description explains WHAT and WHY was made instead of HOW.
The following pattern must be used:
IGNITE-XXXX Change summary
whereXXXX
- number of JIRA issue.(see the Maintainers list)
the
green visa
attached to the JIRA ticket (see TC.Bot: Check PR)Notes
If you need any help, please email [email protected] or ask anу advice on http://asf.slack.com #ignite channel.