Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IGNITE-22733 Introduce TransactionChanges #11675

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

nizhikov
Copy link
Contributor

…test

Thank you for submitting the pull request to the Apache Ignite.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution
we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken:

The Contribution Checklist

  • There is a single JIRA ticket related to the pull request.
  • The web-link to the pull request is attached to the JIRA ticket.
  • The JIRA ticket has the Patch Available state.
  • The pull request body describes changes that have been made.
    The description explains WHAT and WHY was made instead of HOW.
  • The pull request title is treated as the final commit message.
    The following pattern must be used: IGNITE-XXXX Change summary where XXXX - number of JIRA issue.
  • A reviewer has been mentioned through the JIRA comments
    (see the Maintainers list)
  • The pull request has been checked by the Teamcity Bot and
    the green visa attached to the JIRA ticket (see TC.Bot: Check PR)

Notes

If you need any help, please email [email protected] or ask anу advice on http://asf.slack.com #ignite channel.

* Sort new and updated entries collection.
* @param comparator Entries comparator
*/
public void sortNewAndUpdatedEntries(Comparator<E> comparator) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to specify comparator in constructor?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

for (TransactionConcurrency txConcurrency : TransactionConcurrency.values()) {
ExecutorType[] nodeExecTypes = {ExecutorType.SERVER, ExecutorType.CLIENT};
ExecutorType[] thinExecTypes;

if (modify == SQL) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this changes in this patch?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main reason to include test changes in patch is to reduce main patch.
Exclude obvious changes from it.

So I thins yes, we need this :)

);

txChanges.get2().sort(this::compare);
}
else
txChanges = null;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can replace with TransactionChanges#EMPTY, it will done automatically in call ectx.transactionChanges. It will help to remove useless check for null in 254L.

@nizhikov nizhikov merged commit 710960e into apache:master Nov 25, 2024
5 checks passed
luchnikovbsk pushed a commit to luchnikovbsk/ignite that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants