Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(CalendarFrame): adding previous calendar quarter #31889

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexandrusoare
Copy link
Contributor

@alexandrusoare alexandrusoare commented Jan 16, 2025

SUMMARY

Added "Previous calendar quarter"

Fixes #31870

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

BEFORE

image

AFTER

image

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Based on your review schedule, I'll hold off on reviewing this PR until it's marked as ready for review. If you'd like me to take a look now, comment /korbit-review.

Your admin can change your review schedule in the Korbit Console

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.45%. Comparing base (76d897e) to head (a421455).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #31889       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   60.48%   83.45%   +22.96%     
===========================================
  Files        1931      540     -1391     
  Lines       76236    39142    -37094     
  Branches     8568        0     -8568     
===========================================
- Hits        46114    32665    -13449     
+ Misses      28017     6477    -21540     
+ Partials     2105        0     -2105     
Flag Coverage Δ
hive 48.78% <0.00%> (-0.39%) ⬇️
javascript ?
mysql 76.00% <50.00%> (?)
postgres 76.06% <50.00%> (?)
presto 53.29% <50.00%> (-0.51%) ⬇️
python 83.45% <100.00%> (+19.96%) ⬆️
sqlite 75.54% <50.00%> (?)
unit 61.04% <100.00%> (+3.41%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@msyavuz msyavuz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good as well.

@alexandrusoare alexandrusoare marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 08:00
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/DateFilterControl/types.ts
superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/DateFilterControl/utils/constants.ts
superset/utils/date_parser.py

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@dosubot dosubot bot added the explore:time Related to the time filters in Explore label Jan 17, 2025
@geido geido added the preset:bounty Issues that have been selected by Preset and have a bounty attached. label Jan 17, 2025
@@ -276,6 +291,44 @@ def test_get_since_until_instant_time_comparison_enabled() -> None:
assert result == expected


@patch("superset.utils.date_parser.parse_human_datetime")
def test_previous_calendar_quarter(mock_parse):
today = datetime(2023, 1, 15)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've been using freezegun for this in tests, something like:

with freezegun.freeze_time("2023-01-15"):
    result = get_since_until("previous calendar quarter")

@sadpandajoe sadpandajoe requested a review from geido January 17, 2025 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
explore:time Related to the time filters in Explore preset:bounty Issues that have been selected by Preset and have a bounty attached. size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add "Previous Calendar Quarter" Option
4 participants