-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Reduces the form_data_key length #31905
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: Reduces the form_data_key length #31905
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
Category | Issue | Fix Detected |
---|---|---|
Missing function parameter implementation ▹ view |
Files scanned
File Path | Reviewed |
---|---|
superset/key_value/shared_entries.py | ✅ |
superset/key_value/utils.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ❌ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ def set_shared_value(key: SharedKey, value: Any) -> None: | |||
def get_permalink_salt(key: SharedKey) -> str: | |||
salt = get_shared_value(key) | |||
if salt is None: | |||
salt = random_key() | |||
# Use a 48 bytes salt | |||
salt = random_key(48) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing function parameter implementation
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The code assumes that random_key() has been updated to accept a length parameter, but the function definition change is not included in this diff.
Why this matters
This could lead to a runtime error if the random_key() function hasn't been modified to accept parameters, causing the application to crash when generating permalink salts.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Ensure the random_key() function in 'superset/key_value/utils.py' is updated to accept a length parameter before merging this change:
def random_key(length: int = 8) -> str:
# Implementation
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #31905 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 60.48% 83.45% +22.96%
===========================================
Files 1931 540 -1391
Lines 76236 39140 -37096
Branches 8568 0 -8568
===========================================
- Hits 46114 32663 -13451
+ Misses 28017 6477 -21540
+ Partials 2105 0 -2105
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
SUMMARY
When the
form_data_key
was created, it was used to share state between Superset users and required a secure key length. When permalinks were introduced, theform_data_key
role changed to only be used for holding and transferring temporary state for a user session and not more for sharing state between Superset users. This PR reduces theform_data_key
length given that an 8 bytes key is sufficient for its new role.As an example, this will be the diff:
TESTING INSTRUCTIONS
CI should be sufficient.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION