Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update daysim linux binaries #3739

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

reyery
Copy link
Member

@reyery reyery commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Streamlined build process for the Daysim application using pre-built binaries.
    • Updated base image for improved efficiency.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved matplotlib display issues by setting the backend to "Agg".

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile has been refactored to optimize the build process for the Daysim application. The primary change involves switching from building Daysim from source to using a pre-built release image. The base image for the Daysim stage has been changed to ghcr.io/reyery/daysim:release, which eliminates the need for complex build steps like cloning repositories and compiling binaries. The CEA environment setup stage remains largely unchanged, with minor adjustments to stage naming and user configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile - Base image changed from debian:bookworm-slim to pre-built Daysim release image
- Removed source compilation steps for Daysim
- Updated copy command to use pre-built binaries
- Renamed build stages from daysim-build to daysim and cea-build to cea

Poem

🐰 A Docker tale of swift delight,
Where binaries now take their flight
Pre-built magic, no compile strain
Daysim leaps with minimal pain
Efficiency hops, the rabbit's way! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0369979 and 47a951f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Dockerfile (3)

3-3: LGTM! Stage name change improves clarity.

The stage name change from 'cea-build' to 'cea' better reflects its purpose, and the version pinning is maintained.


1-1: Consider pinning to specific version and verifying image integrity.

Using the release tag can lead to inconsistent builds if the tag is updated. Additionally, we should verify the integrity of the pre-built image.

Let's verify the image details and available tags:

Consider:

  1. Pinning to a specific version tag instead of using release
  2. Adding SHA256 digest to the image reference
  3. Moving the image to an organization-controlled repository

28-30: Verify Daysim binary presence and integration.

Copying from the root directory (/) could include unnecessary files. Let's verify the binary presence and integration.

Consider:

  1. Using a more specific source path to copy only necessary files
  2. Adding a verification step to check binary presence and permissions
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the Daysim integration by checking the actual usage in the radiation module.

The first command will help us understand how Daysim binaries are executed, the second will show how the path is used in the radiation module, and the third will help verify the build stage setup. This will give us a better picture of the integration and binary requirements.


Let me try a different approach to check the Daysim binary execution and path usage.

These commands will help us understand which Daysim binaries are required and how they are used in the codebase.


Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response:

Copying from root directory is appropriate for Daysim integration

The code review shows that:

  1. The Daysim integration is well-defined with REQUIRED_BINARIES = {"ds_illum", "epw2wea", "gen_dc", "oconv", "radfiles2daysim", "rtrace_dc"} and REQUIRED_LIBS
  2. The code has proper binary verification through check_daysim_bin_directory() which validates the presence of all required binaries
  3. For Linux (Docker), the code explicitly checks /Daysim/bin path, matching the Dockerfile's COPY instruction
  4. The configuration is properly set with cea-config write --radiation:daysim-bin-directory /Daysim

The current approach of copying from root is actually correct as:

  • It aligns with the expected Linux path in the codebase
  • The binary verification ensures only required files are used
  • The integration is properly validated through the configuration system
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Daysim binary references and integration points

# Check for Daysim binary references in CEA configuration
rg -A 2 "daysim-bin-directory" 

# Check for Daysim binary usage in CEA code
rg -l "Daysim" | grep -v "Dockerfile"

Length of output: 2200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Daysim binary execution in radiation module
ast-grep --pattern 'subprocess.call($$$Daysim$$$)'

# Check how Daysim path is used
rg -A 3 "daysim-bin-directory" cea/resources/radiation/daysim.py

# List files in the Daysim directory of the build stage
fd . -t f daysim-bin

Length of output: 238


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how Daysim executables are called in the radiation module
rg -A 2 "subprocess.*call.*Daysim" cea/resources/radiation/

# Check the content of daysim.py to understand binary requirements
cat cea/resources/radiation/daysim.py

# Check if there are any specific Daysim binaries mentioned in the code
rg -l "ds_illum|gen_dc|radmap|rtrace_dc" cea/resources/radiation/

Length of output: 17139


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ShiZhongming ShiZhongming added is-bug priority-must-have These requirements are critical and must be included in CEA labels Dec 17, 2024
@ShiZhongming ShiZhongming added this to the CEA4 - Mar'25 milestone Dec 17, 2024
@ShiZhongming ShiZhongming merged commit 22b91b3 into release-4.0 Dec 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@ShiZhongming ShiZhongming deleted the update-daysim-binaries branch December 17, 2024 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
is-bug priority-must-have These requirements are critical and must be included in CEA
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants