-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update daysim linux binaries #3739
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Dockerfile has been refactored to optimize the build process for the Daysim application. The primary change involves switching from building Daysim from source to using a pre-built release image. The base image for the Daysim stage has been changed to Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)Dockerfile (3)
The stage name change from 'cea-build' to 'cea' better reflects its purpose, and the version pinning is maintained.
Using the Let's verify the image details and available tags: Consider:
Copying from the root directory (/) could include unnecessary files. Let's verify the binary presence and integration. Consider:
✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the Daysim integration by checking the actual usage in the radiation module. The first command will help us understand how Daysim binaries are executed, the second will show how the path is used in the radiation module, and the third will help verify the build stage setup. This will give us a better picture of the integration and binary requirements. Let me try a different approach to check the Daysim binary execution and path usage. These commands will help us understand which Daysim binaries are required and how they are used in the codebase. Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response: Copying from root directory is appropriate for Daysim integration The code review shows that:
The current approach of copying from root is actually correct as:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Daysim binary references and integration points
# Check for Daysim binary references in CEA configuration
rg -A 2 "daysim-bin-directory"
# Check for Daysim binary usage in CEA code
rg -l "Daysim" | grep -v "Dockerfile"
Length of output: 2200 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check Daysim binary execution in radiation module
ast-grep --pattern 'subprocess.call($$$Daysim$$$)'
# Check how Daysim path is used
rg -A 3 "daysim-bin-directory" cea/resources/radiation/daysim.py
# List files in the Daysim directory of the build stage
fd . -t f daysim-bin
Length of output: 238 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check how Daysim executables are called in the radiation module
rg -A 2 "subprocess.*call.*Daysim" cea/resources/radiation/
# Check the content of daysim.py to understand binary requirements
cat cea/resources/radiation/daysim.py
# Check if there are any specific Daysim binaries mentioned in the code
rg -l "ds_illum|gen_dc|radmap|rtrace_dc" cea/resources/radiation/
Length of output: 17139 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes