Add route for project choices if project root exists #3757
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@reyery has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the project management functionality in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cea/interfaces/dashboard/api/project.py (3)
216-220: Improve error message clarity for undefined project root.The current error message doesn't specify which root (project_root or new_project.project_root) is missing. This could be confusing for users.
- if new_project.project_root is None and project_root is None: - raise HTTPException( - status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST, - detail="Project root not defined", - ) + if new_project.project_root is None and project_root is None: + raise HTTPException( + status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST, + detail="Neither project_root parameter nor new_project.project_root is defined", + )
222-224: Improve variable naming and add path validation.
- The variable name
_rootwith underscore prefix suggests private use, which isn't appropriate here.- Consider validating that the resulting path is a valid project location.
- _root = new_project.project_root or project_root - try: - project = secure_path(os.path.join(_root, new_project.project_name)) + selected_root = new_project.project_root or project_root + try: + if not os.path.isdir(selected_root): + raise HTTPException( + status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST, + detail=f"Selected root path '{selected_root}' is not a valid directory", + ) + project = secure_path(os.path.join(selected_root, new_project.project_name))
200-204: Consider using pathlib for path manipulation.The code uses
os.pathfor path manipulation. Consider usingpathlibfor more modern and object-oriented path handling.- config.project = cea_project + config.project = str(Path(cea_project).resolve()) project_info = { - 'name': os.path.basename(config.project), - 'project': config.project, + 'name': Path(config.project).name, + 'project': str(Path(config.project)),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cea/interfaces/dashboard/api/project.py(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: windows-latest
- GitHub Check: macos-latest
- GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cea/interfaces/dashboard/api/project.py (1)
51-51: LGTM! Good use of Optional type.The change to make
project_rootoptional with a default value ofNonealigns well with the PR objective for flexible project root handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
cea/tests/optimization/test_network_temperature.py (2)
Line range hint
1-23: Replace placeholder setup code with actual test requirements.The setup methods contain example code that should be replaced with actual test requirements:
shared_resourceinsetUpClassis unusedtest_dataandsome_variableinsetUpare unused- Documentation comments are generic and don't describe actual test setup
Consider implementing the actual test requirements:
@classmethod def setUpClass(cls): - """Set up resources shared across all test cases.""" - # Example: Load shared test data or initialize configurations - cls.shared_resource = "some_shared_resource" + """Initialize shared test data for network temperature tests.""" + # Initialize weather data or network configuration needed across tests + cls.yearly_average_temperature = 20 # Move from set_network_temperature def setUp(self): - """Set up resources specific to each individual test.""" - # Example: Reinitialize a variable or mock dependencies - self.test_data = {"key": "value"} - self.some_variable = 0 + """Initialize test-specific network parameters.""" + self.standard_dh_temperature = 60 + self.standard_dc_temperature = 10
Line range hint
25-39: Improve test coverage for network temperature validation.The current test implementation is missing several critical test cases:
test_function_with_invalid_inputonly tests one error case- Missing tests for standard temperatures when temperature is None
- Missing tests for yearly average temperature boundary conditions
Add the following test cases:
def test_standard_temperatures_when_none(self): """Test default temperatures when None is provided.""" self.assertEqual(set_network_temperature('DH', None), 60, "Should return standard DH temperature") self.assertEqual(set_network_temperature('DC', None), 10, "Should return standard DC temperature") def test_yearly_average_boundaries(self): """Test temperatures at yearly average boundaries.""" yearly_avg = 20 self.assertEqual(set_network_temperature('DH', yearly_avg), yearly_avg, "Should accept yearly average for DH") self.assertEqual(set_network_temperature('DC', yearly_avg), yearly_avg, "Should accept yearly average for DC") def test_invalid_network_type(self): """Test invalid network type.""" with self.assertRaises(ValueError): set_network_temperature('invalid_type', 60)
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cea/tests/optimization/test_network_temperature.py (2)
Line range hint
44-89: Improve implementation of set_network_temperature function.Several improvements are needed in the implementation:
- The yearly average temperature is hard-coded with a TODO comment
- Inconsistent error handling - network type validation is implicit
- Missing type hints
- Contains redundant empty lines
Consider the following improvements:
-def set_network_temperature(network_type, temperature): +from typing import Union, Literal + +def set_network_temperature( + network_type: Literal["DH", "DC"], + temperature: Union[float, int, None] +) -> float: """Example function for testing.""" standard_dh_temperature = 60 #°C standard_dc_temperature = 10 #°C min_network_temperature = 0 #°C max_network_temperature = 150 #°C - yearly_average_temperature = 20 # TODO: change to something like self.weather['drybulb_C'].mean() + # TODO: Inject this value through constructor or parameter + yearly_average_temperature = 20 + + if network_type not in ("DH", "DC"): + raise ValueError(f"Invalid network type: {network_type}. Must be 'DH' or 'DC'") if temperature is None: if network_type == "DH":
Line range hint
67-77: Improve error message formatting.The error messages have concatenation issues and could be more readable.
- raise ValueError("For district heating networks, the network temperature needs to fall between the" - f"average outdoor temperature {yearly_average_temperature}°C and " - f"{max_network_temperature}°C. Please adjust your configurations accordingly.") + raise ValueError( + f"For district heating networks, the network temperature needs to fall between the " + f"average outdoor temperature ({yearly_average_temperature}°C) and " + f"{max_network_temperature}°C. Please adjust your configurations accordingly." + )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cea/optimization_new/building.py(0 hunks)cea/tests/optimization/test_network_temperature.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- cea/optimization_new/building.py
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
pytesttounittestframework for improved structure and resource management.