Skip to content

Fix incorrect socialmessaging command #9458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: v2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SamRemis
Copy link
Member

This PR fixes a relatively new command that had a human error due to manually renaming it to preserve branding. All customers currently using this command are aware of this breaking change.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

{
"type": "bugfix",
"category": "socialmessaging",
"description": "Fixes incorrect customization for renaming a socialmessaging command"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd describe what is changing from a user's perspective, since "customization for renaming" is internal.

Copy link
Member

@ashovlin ashovlin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why a different approach than #9450?

@SamRemis
Copy link
Member Author

SamRemis commented Apr 28, 2025

Why a different approach than #9450?

The usage of this command in CliV1 and botocore is significantly higher, so renaming it in a braking way for them is not an option. Usage is low enough in CLIv2 that we can fix this at the source and not need to maintain a complicated customization in v2; all customers currently calling this command have already been notified of this breaking change, so we can safely make it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants