Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix/KBDEV-1270 Error handling when expanding graph view failed #96

Conversation

sshugsc
Copy link
Contributor

@sshugsc sshugsc commented Jan 8, 2025

KBDEV-1270

  • check for deleted edge to avoid undefined error
  • make getEdges not return soft deleted edge

This comment has been minimized.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.78%. Comparing base (c9e1d05) to head (c88c2b8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #96      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    56.76%   56.78%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          102      102              
  Lines         3874     3876       +2     
  Branches      1310     1311       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits          2199     2201       +2     
  Misses        1663     1663              
  Partials        12       12              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

@sshugsc sshugsc merged commit 6965dd5 into develop Feb 25, 2025
3 checks passed
Copy link

Unit Test Results

    1 files  ±0    39 suites  ±0   1m 40s ⏱️ -1s
160 tests ±0  159 ✔️ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
156 runs  ±0  155 ✔️ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 6965dd5. ± Comparison against base commit c9e1d05.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants