uses: astral-sh/ruff-action@v3

[cclauss]

https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-action

Ruff is written in Rust so it does not require any particular version of Python.

[dnicolodi]

Thanks, using the action is maybe nicer than installing ruff via pip, except that IIUC the action defaults to annotating the patch using ruff's github output format. I'm not a fan of having automated tools spam the PRs with annotations that often make it harder to focus on the review comements from humans.

However, the main question is: why? I'm a bit surprised by a passing by contribution touching the CI setup of a project. I start to be suspicious when the commit message for the patch is badly worded and formatted. What did prompt this patch?

[cclauss]

the action defaults to annotating the patch using ruff's github output format

I made a second commit which should undo that default. I have never heard objections to GitHub Annotations but everyone has unique impressions.

a passing by contribution touching the CI setup of a project.

I am learning how folks use ruff so I read GitHub Actions that use it and suggest optimizations when I see opportunities.

What did prompt this patch?

beanquery was added to homebrew so the repo caught my attention. I apologize if my commit message is cryptic.