-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Encoder interface #194
Open
fabiojmendes
wants to merge
13
commits into
birdayz:master
Choose a base branch
from
fabiojmendes:encoder_interface
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Encoder interface #194
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d10fc24
Codec interface
fabiojmendes eb82e6c
Refactoring producer to use the new encoders
fabiojmendes d7a29ea
Renaming to codec package
fabiojmendes 780046f
Improving error reporting
fabiojmendes d8f7bf9
Adding text fixtures for protobuf
fabiojmendes d99ea05
Adding docs
fabiojmendes a85270b
Removing dead code
fabiojmendes 72aaef5
Chaging the encoding interface contract to use json
fabiojmendes 5913916
Changing the interface to json.RawMessage
fabiojmendes 42b69f3
Delaying the encoding so it can be used for templating as well
fabiojmendes edf7a96
Moving files around acording to code review feedback
fabiojmendes 1add193
Using interface to decode messages
fabiojmendes 6b57272
Adding flag to use strict avro parsing
fabiojmendes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this might be the time for a new flag edit: (it's actually not a breaking change)
We could add:
--key-codec auto|proto|avro-json|avro
auto would be default, and behave as-is. it would try its best to decide what do do: if proto key/value flags are given, it will try proto. if avro flags are given, it will try avro-json. but it can be set to specifically pick avro (see #195)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure about this one, for proto I think it would be a little redundant because you have to specify
--key-proto-type
anyways. I guess we don't have the same problem we have with avro here.Maybe a flag specific for avro would be enough. It also doesn't need to be specific to keys, It can apply for both keys and values at the same time. Something like:
What do you think?
There's a separate issue with avro and proto though. The current behaviour is a little misleading imo. If you specify both proto and avro, proto takes precedence. Maybe we should have some validation and throw an error in this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's ok for me. do you know if "avro-json" is the right term? is there any "better" term in the avro world for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably not, I'll check their docs see if I find anything. Another option would be just a boolean flag like
--avro-strict
then the docs can say something regarding being strict about unions.A wiki page with examples of what we've been talking would be nice too.