Skip to content

I guessed a missing word. #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

I guessed a missing word. #10

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/tutorials/using-fulfill.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ In short, anything you need your bot to do that your AI doesn't, is probably a c

"Separation of concerns" is generally considered a good thing. It turns out that in bot design, it's an especially good thing. Why do we say that?

Designing your conversational flow and how your bot responds to questions is an analyst-type job - you need people good at understanding the problem domain and how to craft a great conversations. You these people to have a nice life, unencumbered by any technical complexities.
Designing your conversational flow and how your bot responds to questions is an analyst-type job - you need people good at understanding the problem domain and how to craft a great conversations. You want these people to have a nice life, unencumbered by any technical complexities.

If your bot needs to invoke programming logic, for example to call an external API and include the results into the bot's response, you surely want to keep that programming away from your conversational analysts.

Expand Down