Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize Github Actions #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2025
Merged

Optimize Github Actions #20

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2025

Conversation

devahmedshendy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (65b8a9a) to head (fccc318).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #20   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         24      24           
  Lines        393     393           
=====================================
  Misses       393     393           
Flag Coverage Δ
ios18.1 0.00% <ø> (ø)
ios18.2 0.00% <ø> (ø)
spm 0.00% <ø> (ø)
swift- 0.00% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu 0.00% <ø> (ø)
visionos2.1 0.00% <ø> (ø)
watchos11.1 0.00% <ø> (ø)
watchos11.2 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@devahmedshendy devahmedshendy marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2025 21:49
@devahmedshendy devahmedshendy requested a review from leogdion March 2, 2025 21:49
@devahmedshendy
Copy link
Contributor Author

devahmedshendy commented Mar 2, 2025

@leogdion I see you removed these inputs from "Process Coverage" step in BushelKit ci, do you want them removed here too:

        with:
          fail-on-empty-output: true

@leogdion
Copy link
Member

leogdion commented Mar 2, 2025

@leogdion I see you removed these inputs from "Process Coverage" step in BushelKit ci, do you want them removed here too:

        with:
          fail-on-empty-output: true

no

@devahmedshendy devahmedshendy merged commit 344a774 into main Mar 2, 2025
14 checks passed
@devahmedshendy devahmedshendy deleted the optimize-github-actions branch March 2, 2025 22:14
@leogdion leogdion restored the optimize-github-actions branch March 2, 2025 22:15
@leogdion leogdion deleted the optimize-github-actions branch March 2, 2025 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants