Refactor list components and fix lints #1162
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant F as FilterAndListComponents
participant G as getComponentsForSpecificStack
participant P as processAllStacks
participant S as StacksMap
F->>G: Request components for specific stack
alt Specific stack exists
G->>S: Validate stack existence
S-->>G: Return stack status
G-->>F: Return components or error (using new error vars)
else No specific stack
F->>P: Process all stacks
P->>S: Iterate through stacks
S-->>P: Return components/skip invalid ones
P-->>F: Return aggregated components
end
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code Definitions (1)pkg/list/list_components_test.go (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go (1)
62-73: Consider adding error logging in processAllStacks.The function silently skips invalid stacks, which might hide underlying issues. Consider logging these errors or adding a debug option to surface these errors.
func processAllStacks(stacksMap map[string]any) []string { var components []string for stackName, stackData := range stacksMap { stackComponents, err := getStackComponents(stackData) if err != nil { - continue // Skip invalid stacks. + // Log error and continue + fmt.Printf("Warning: Skipping invalid stack %s: %v\n", stackName, err) + continue } components = append(components, stackComponents...) } return components }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (8)
pkg/list/list_components.go (8)
11-23: Good improvement in error handling with specific error variables.The introduction of these specific error variables makes error handling more robust and explicit throughout the code. Following Go's conventions with "Err" prefix and providing clear documentation for each error type is a solid approach.
28-30: Clean error return using predefined error variable.Using the new predefined error variable improves consistency. Good job simplifying from generic error messages.
33-35: Consistent error handling with predefined variable.Updating to use the predefined error enhances maintainability and consistency with the rest of the code.
38-40: Consistent use of predefined error.Same good improvement as previous error handling changes.
45-60: Well-structured new helper function with appropriate error wrapping.The new helper function
getComponentsForSpecificStackproperly encapsulates the logic for extracting components from a specific stack. Good use of error wrapping to provide context.
80-86: Good delegation to helper function.Extracting the specific stack handling to a dedicated function makes the code more modular and readable.
87-89: Clean delegation to processAllStacks.Using the new helper function makes the code more modular and easier to maintain. The comment is slightly redundant given the function name but doesn't hurt readability.
91-94: Good organization of component post-processing.Marking the section as component post-processing with a comment improves readability. The deduplication and sorting steps are clear.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1162 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 25.74% 25.87% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 179 179
Lines 20591 20603 +12
==========================================
+ Hits 5301 5330 +29
+ Misses 14443 14431 -12
+ Partials 847 842 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
what
Refactor list components for new lint standards
why
I will use this component in furter list components filter development and need to clean this up in order to reduce PR changes
references
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests