Merge pull request #1733 from emko-274/summary_pdf_to_zip

changes to downloadables and relevant tests

src/backend/expungeservice/charge_classifier.py

@@ -464,14 +464,17 @@ def _sex_crime(statute):
             return AmbiguousChargeTypeWithQuestion([SexCrime()])
         elif statute in SexCrime.romeo_and_juliet_exceptions:
             question_string = """
-            Select "Yes" if ALL of the following are true:
-            1. The victim's lack of consent was solely due to age (statutory rape) AND
-            2. You were under 23 years old when the act occurred AND
-            3. The victim was less than five years younger than you when the act occurred
+            Select "No" if all of the following are true:
+            
+                1. Are you required to report as a sex offender?
+                2. Do you have any charges that are not eligible for expungement?
+                3. Is your sex offense conviction a Class A or Class B Felony?
+
+            If your answer to ALL 3 of these questions is "NO", this charge may be eligible for expungement.
             """
             options = {
-                "Yes (Rare, contact [email protected])": RomeoAndJulietNMASexCrime(),
-                "No": RomeoAndJulietIneligibleSexCrime(),
+                "Yes": RomeoAndJulietIneligibleSexCrime(),
+                "No (Rare, contact [email protected])": RomeoAndJulietNMASexCrime(),
             }
             return ChargeClassifier._build_ambiguous_charge_type_with_question(question_string, options)
 

src/backend/expungeservice/models/case.py

@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ class Case(OeciCase):
 
     def has_eligible_conviction(self):
         eligible_charges, ineligible_charges = Case.partition_by_eligibility(self.charges)
+        #add needs more analysis charges if made eligible
         dismissals, convictions = Case.categorize_charges(eligible_charges)
         return len(convictions) > 0
 

src/backend/expungeservice/pdf/markdown_renderer.py

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ def to_markdown(record: Dict, header: Optional[str] = None, aliases: List[Dict]
             for x in record["summary"]["charges_grouped_by_eligibility_and_case"]
             if x[0] == "Eligible Now If Balance Paid"
         ]
+
+        county_fines = [x for x in record["summary"]["county_fines"]]
         eligible_charges_by_date = record["summary"]["charges_grouped_by_eligibility_and_case"]
         future_eligible_charges = [
             (key, eligible_charges_for_date)
@@ -35,7 +37,8 @@ def to_markdown(record: Dict, header: Optional[str] = None, aliases: List[Dict]
             ineligible_case_charges=ineligible_case_charges,
             eligible_if_paid_case_charges=eligible_if_paid_case_charges,
             future_eligible_charges=sorted(future_eligible_charges, key=MarkdownRenderer._sort_future_eligible),
-            needs_more_analysis_charges=needs_more_analysis_charges
+            needs_more_analysis_charges=needs_more_analysis_charges,
+            county_fines = county_fines,
         )
 
     @staticmethod
@@ -72,4 +75,4 @@ def _sort_future_eligible(group):
                 return date.isoformat()
             except ValueError:
                 pass
-        return label
+        return label

src/backend/expungeservice/templates/expungement_analysis_report.md.j2

@@ -15,10 +15,6 @@ Name: {{ name }}
 {% endif %}
 
 ## PLEASE READ THIS
-
-### Disclaimer:
-RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.
-
 {% if has_open_cases %}
 <b>You have open charges. You are not eligible to expunge ANY records, including old charges, while you have open charges.</b>
 {% endif %}
@@ -55,7 +51,6 @@ These convictions are not eligible for expungement at any time under the current
     {% include 'partials/case.md.j2' %}
   {% endfor %}
 {% endif %}
-
 {% if eligible_if_paid_case_charges | count > 0 %}
 ## Charges Eligible Now If Balance Paid
 These convictions are eligible as soon as the balance of fines on the case is paid.
@@ -86,3 +81,17 @@ Additionally, you have charges for which the online records do not contain enoug
     {% include 'partials/case.md.j2' %}
   {% endfor %}
 {% endif %}
+{% if county_fines | count > 0 %}
+## Balance Due by County
+  {% for county in county_fines %}
+    {% if county['case_fines'] | length > 0 %}
+      {{county['county_name']}}
+      {% for fine in county['case_fines'] %}
+        {{fine['case_number']}} - {{fine['balance']}}
+      {% endfor %}
+    {% endif %}
+  {% endfor %}
+{% endif %}
+
+### Disclaimer:
+RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.

src/backend/tests/models/charge_types/test_sex_crimes.py

@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ def test_sex_crimes_with_romeo_and_juliet_exception(sex_crimes_statute):
         name="Generic", statute=sex_crimes_statute, level="Misdemeanor Class A", disposition=Dispositions.CONVICTED
     )
     type_eligibility = RecordMerger.merge_type_eligibilities(charges)
-    assert isinstance(charges[0].charge_type, RomeoAndJulietNMASexCrime)
-    assert isinstance(charges[1].charge_type, RomeoAndJulietIneligibleSexCrime)
+    assert isinstance(charges[1].charge_type, RomeoAndJulietNMASexCrime)
+    assert isinstance(charges[0].charge_type, RomeoAndJulietIneligibleSexCrime)
     assert type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE
     assert (
         type_eligibility.reason
-        == "Young Offender Sex Crime, Needs More Analysis – Possibly meets requirements under 137.225(6)(f) - Email [email protected] with subject line '6F' for free and confidential further analysis OR Young Offender Sex Crime, Ineligible – Fails to meet requirements under 137.225(6)(f)"
+        == "Young Offender Sex Crime, Ineligible – Fails to meet requirements under 137.225(6)(f) OR Young Offender Sex Crime, Needs More Analysis – Possibly meets requirements under 137.225(6)(f) - Email [email protected] with subject line '6F' for free and confidential further analysis"
     )

src/backend/tests/pdf/expected/custom_header.md

@@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
 
 ## PLEASE READ THIS
 
-### Disclaimer:
-RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.
-
-
 ### Assumptions
 <b>1) Successful completion of court requirements</b> &nbsp; If you are currently on probation or conditional discharge, the analysis below assumes that you will successfully complete those requirements.
 
@@ -24,7 +20,6 @@ If the above assumptions are not true for you and you would like an updated anal
 ## Charges Eligible Now
 You are not currently eligible to expunge any charges.
 
-
 ## Charges Eligible Now If Balance Paid
 These convictions are eligible as soon as the balance of fines on the case is paid.
 
@@ -33,3 +28,9 @@ These convictions are eligible as soon as the balance of fines on the case is pa
      - CASEJD1: Possession of Cocaine (DISMISSED) Charged Feb 17, 2009
 
 
+## Balance Due by County
+      Multnomah
+        CASEJD1 - 529.08
+
+### Disclaimer:
+RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.

src/backend/tests/pdf/expected/default.md

@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@ Name: JOHN  DOE
 
 ## PLEASE READ THIS
 
-### Disclaimer:
-RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.
-
-
 ### Assumptions
 <b>1) Successful completion of court requirements</b> &nbsp; If you are currently on probation or conditional discharge, the analysis below assumes that you will successfully complete those requirements.
 
@@ -27,7 +23,6 @@ If the above assumptions are not true for you and you would like an updated anal
 ## Charges Eligible Now
 You are not currently eligible to expunge any charges.
 
-
 ## Charges Eligible Now If Balance Paid
 These convictions are eligible as soon as the balance of fines on the case is paid.
 
@@ -36,3 +31,9 @@ These convictions are eligible as soon as the balance of fines on the case is pa
      - CASEJD1: Possession of Cocaine (DISMISSED) Charged Feb 17, 2009
 
 
+## Balance Due by County
+      Multnomah
+        CASEJD1 - 529.08
+
+### Disclaimer:
+RecordSponge is not your lawyer. The results below should be used as a guide only. If you are relying on this information to expunge your record, please email [email protected] for free consultation.

src/backend/tests/pdf/test_markdown_renderer.py

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ def example_record():
             "CASEJD1": CaseDetails.CASE_WITH_REVOKED_PROBATION,
         },
     )
-
+    
 def test_render_markdown(example_record):
     record_summary = RecordSummarizer.summarize(example_record, {})
     record = json.loads(json.dumps(record_summary, cls=ExpungeModelEncoder))

src/frontend/src/components/App/__snapshots__/App.test.tsx.snap

@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ Array [
           <p
             className="tc fw7 white mw7 mh4"
           >
-            Over 10,000 analyses delivered as of January 2023
+            Over 20,000 analyses delivered as of July 2024
           </p>
         </div>
       </div>
@@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ Array [
               <p
                 className="mw7 lh-copy tc center mb3"
               >
-                Having performed expungement analysis both with and without the assistance of RecordSponge, I know that this program vastly decreases the time needed to perform expungement analysis, and vastly increases the number of people we can assist with expungements.
+                Having performed expungement analysis both with and without the assistance of RecordSponge, I know that this program vastly decreases the time to perform expungement analysis, and vastly increases the number of people we can assist with expungements.
               </p>
               <footer
                 className="mw7 tc center fw6 f5-ns mb5"

src/frontend/src/components/Landing/index.tsx

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ class Landing extends React.Component {
                 <PartnerTable />
                 <span className="db w4 center bb bw2 b--blue mb3"></span>
                 <p className="tc fw7 white mw7 mh4">
-                  Over 10,000 analyses delivered as of January 2023
+                  Over 20,000 analyses delivered as of July 2024
                 </p>
               </div>
             </div>
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ class Landing extends React.Component {
                     <p className="mw7 lh-copy tc center mb3">
                       Having performed expungement analysis both with and
                       without the assistance of RecordSponge, I know that this
-                      program vastly decreases the time needed to perform
+                      program vastly decreases the time to perform
                       expungement analysis, and vastly increases the number of
                       people we can assist with expungements.
                     </p>