Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More ineligibility categories #1678

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

wittejm
Copy link
Contributor

@wittejm wittejm commented Mar 10, 2023

this covers part of #1656

This uses a demo record to test, which I expanded with two cases that provide the new ineligibility categories.
Screenshot 2023-03-09 at 12 33 57 PM

@wittejm wittejm changed the title Jw/more ineligibility categories More ineligibility categories Mar 10, 2023
@wittejm wittejm force-pushed the jw/more-ineligibility-categories branch from ccf2948 to cdbcbe0 Compare March 15, 2023 23:23
@wittejm wittejm force-pushed the jw/more-ineligibility-categories branch from cdbcbe0 to 074bcd7 Compare March 15, 2023 23:27
@wittejm
Copy link
Contributor Author

wittejm commented Mar 15, 2023

Ready for review @KentShikama . I was stuck for a while on a bug from groupby using a different key from the sort that's done on the list immediately prior. So it now reuses the same key function.

It's not clear to me what this sort is even for (the ordered numbers in the key function) since the grouped charges don't get rendered in the same order.

Copy link
Member

@KentShikama KentShikama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to handle the deploy once you confirm on dev.recordsponge.com that it's working

@wittejm wittejm merged commit 089be0a into codeforpdx:master Mar 16, 2023
@wittejm wittejm deleted the jw/more-ineligibility-categories branch July 26, 2024 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants