chore(deps): update dependency com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java to v4

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java	major	3.25.3 -> 4.27.2

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[github-actions]

This pull request seems a bit stale.. Shall we invite more to the party?

[renovate]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.67%. Comparing base (a1c0ed7) to head (2aa1a33).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #761   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.67%   84.67%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines        2688     2688           
  Branches      235      235           
=======================================
  Hits         2276     2276           
  Misses        412      412           

[larshagencognite]

@dmivankov thoughts on this? 4.28 and 4.29 came with backward compatibility fixes for files generated by <=3.25, and it looks like it works fine now

[dmivankov]

Sounds fine, worst case downstream repos fail some test, or at least I hope they test it. Should mainly be for timeseries datapoints