Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add graphql endpoints for querying asset check automation history #26170

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

OwenKephart
Copy link
Contributor

Summary & Motivation

As title

How I Tested These Changes

Changelog

NOCHANGELOG

Copy link
Contributor Author

OwenKephart commented Nov 27, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Comment on lines +193 to +197
def resolve_automationCondition(
self, _graphene_info: ResolveInfo
) -> Optional[GrapheneAutoMaterializePolicy]:
automation_condition = (
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The return type annotation Optional[GrapheneAutoMaterializePolicy] doesn't match the actual return type of this method, which is Optional[GrapheneAutomationCondition]. This mismatch could cause type checking errors and make the code harder to maintain. Please update the type annotation to match the implementation.

Spotted by Graphite Reviewer

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 11-27-add_graphql_endpoints_for_querying_asset_check_automation_history branch from d47d9b3 to 679ac0d Compare November 27, 2024 18:51
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 11-27-add_graphql_endpoints_for_querying_asset_check_automation_history branch from 679ac0d to d02efc2 Compare December 18, 2024 16:25
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 11-27-add_graphql_endpoints_for_querying_asset_check_automation_history branch from d02efc2 to 76f99d1 Compare December 18, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant