Skip to content

📝 Add Board Affiliation and Co-Affiliation limits (4.9 and 4.10) #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jefftriplett
Copy link
Member

Fixes #4

@jefftriplett jefftriplett changed the title 📝 Add board affiliation and limit rules to bylaws 📝 Add Board Affiliation and Co-Affiliation limits (4.9 and 4.10) Apr 10, 2025
@jefftriplett jefftriplett requested a review from a team April 10, 2025 14:23
Comment on lines +117 to +121
(a) is an employee, officer, or member of the Board of Directors of another entity;

(b) maintains a significant consulting relationship with another entity; or

(c) owns at least 1% of the equity or debt, or derivatives thereof, of another entity.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
(a) is an employee, officer, or member of the Board of Directors of another entity;
(b) maintains a significant consulting relationship with another entity; or
(c) owns at least 1% of the equity or debt, or derivatives thereof, of another entity.
1. is an employee, officer, or member of the Board of Directors of another entity
2. maintains a significant consulting relationship with another entity; or
3. owns at least 1% of the equity or debt, or derivatives thereof, of another entity.

Is it possible for us to use more accessible formatting for this as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is fine to do, but I'm going to leave it open, in case there's a legal(ease) reason that I'm not aware of for why we should keep it.

(noting this mostly to myself, but we should probably preview it in case we need to indent the bullets since our overall doc structure is weird to being with)

@thibaudcolas thibaudcolas requested a review from a team April 11, 2025 05:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Affiliations of Board Members
2 participants