-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 995
Auto-escape MSBuild special characters in MsBuildArgument #2729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Gal-lankri
wants to merge
3
commits into
dotnet:master
Choose a base branch
from
Gal-lankri:feature/msbuild-escape
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+62
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f61f235
Fix: escape MSBuild special characters in MsBuildArgument with unit test
Gal-lankri 37a02ca
Add test for percent escaping and avoid double-escape for known patterns
Gal-lankri 5c6f4e3
Feature: add escapeSpecialChars param to MsBuildArgument constructor
Gal-lankri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If anyone has already escaped their arguments, this will break them. Is there a way to avoid any breaks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great point — thanks for flagging that!
You're absolutely right: blindly escaping everything could break cases where users already passed escaped values like
%3B
or%25
.To handle this safely, I updated the implementation to:
%3B
,%24
, etc.)Additionally, if preferred, I can also add a
bool alreadyEscaped = false
parameter to theMsBuildArgument
constructor. That way:Let me know if you'd prefer we add that constructor overload as well. Happy to follow up with it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can get weird if someone puts
100%25
, it's ambiguous to us whether it should be100%
or100%25
. I think it would be better to add abool escapeSpecialChars = true
param (orfalse
default to preserve existing behavior), and don't try to parse for existing escapes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good point, thank you!
You're right, there's no reliable way to guess the user's intent in edge cases like
100%25
. Maybe it's smarter to let the user to decide.I've updated the implementation to:
bool escapeSpecialChars = true
parameter to theMsBuildArgument
constructortrue
, the value is escapedfalse
, the value is passed through exactly as provided (for pre-escaped input)This avoids ambiguity and doesn't change the default behavior for existing users.