Skip to content

[New Rules] Potential Relay Attack against a Computer Account #4826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

w0rk3r
Copy link
Contributor

@w0rk3r w0rk3r commented Jun 18, 2025

Summary

Introduce 2 new rules to cover potential relay attacks by identifying coercion attempts followed by authentication events using a target server's computer account, originating from a different host. This may indicate that an attacker has captured and relayed the server's computer account hash to execute code on behalf of the compromised system.

Expands an existing detection to cover related activity, with reduced confidence.

Blocker

This PR is blocked by an potential EQL bug that prevents us from using winlog.computer_name in the sequence condition. Slack thread

@w0rk3r w0rk3r requested a review from Samirbous June 18, 2025 14:24
@w0rk3r w0rk3r self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
@w0rk3r w0rk3r added Rule: New Proposal for new rule Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule OS: Windows windows related rules Domain: Endpoint backport: auto labels Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Jun 18, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential NTLM Relay Attack against a Computer Account (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Potential Computer Account Relay Activity (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Potential Kerberos Relay Attack against a Computer Account (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport: auto Domain: Endpoint OS: Windows windows related rules Rule: New Proposal for new rule Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants